Research tools via uni CLI. Use when user wants to search the web, find academic papers, browse Reddit, read Hacker News, or look up Wikipedia. Services: exa (web search), arxiv (papers), reddit, hn (Hacker News), wiki (Wikipedia).
99
100%
Does it follow best practices?
Impact
Pending
No eval scenarios have been run
Advisory
Suggest reviewing before use
Quality
Discovery
100%Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.
This is a well-crafted skill description that excels across all dimensions. It clearly states what the skill does (research via uni CLI with specific services), when to use it (explicit trigger scenarios), and includes natural keywords users would actually say. The description is concise yet comprehensive.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Specificity | Lists multiple specific concrete actions: 'search the web, find academic papers, browse Reddit, read Hacker News, or look up Wikipedia' and names specific services (exa, arxiv, reddit, hn, wiki). | 3 / 3 |
Completeness | Clearly answers both what ('Research tools via uni CLI' with specific services listed) and when ('Use when user wants to search the web, find academic papers, browse Reddit, read Hacker News, or look up Wikipedia'). | 3 / 3 |
Trigger Term Quality | Excellent coverage of natural terms users would say: 'search the web', 'academic papers', 'Reddit', 'Hacker News', 'Wikipedia', plus service abbreviations like 'hn' and 'wiki' that users might use. | 3 / 3 |
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk | Clear niche focused on research and information retrieval via specific named services; the combination of web search, academic papers, and specific platforms (Reddit, HN, Wikipedia) creates a distinct identity unlikely to conflict with other skills. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 12 / 12 Passed |
Implementation
100%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
Excellent skill content that serves as a concise CLI reference. It provides immediately actionable commands organized by service, assumes Claude's competence, and wastes no tokens on explanations Claude doesn't need. The inline comments provide just enough context without being verbose.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Extremely lean and efficient. No unnecessary explanations of what web search or Wikipedia are. Every line is a concrete command example that earns its place. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Fully executable, copy-paste ready commands with clear variations showing different flags and options. Comments explain purpose without verbosity. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | This is a simple, single-purpose skill (CLI reference). Each service section is clearly organized with unambiguous commands. No multi-step workflows requiring validation checkpoints. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized into logical sections by service. Under 50 lines with no need for external references. Content is appropriately structured for a CLI reference skill. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 12 / 12 Passed |
Validation
90%Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.
Validation — 10 / 11 Passed
Validation for skill structure
| Criteria | Description | Result |
|---|---|---|
allowed_tools_field | 'allowed-tools' contains unusual tool name(s) | Warning |
Total | 10 / 11 Passed | |
f1dfc90
Table of Contents
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.