CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

brainstorming

Coordinates collaborative design sessions that explore requirements, analyze codebase context, and produce an approved design document with trade-offs. Use when building a new feature, adding functionality, creating components, modifying behavior, starting a project, or planning any creative work. DO NOT TRIGGER when the user already has a concrete design and just wants implementation.

75

Quality

92%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Advisory

Suggest reviewing before use

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

85%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

A well-structured process skill with concrete actionability, explicit validation checkpoints, and clear workflow sequencing. Its main weakness is conciseness: the approval/wait directive and HARD-GATE are repeated across multiple sections and could be consolidated.

Suggestions

Consolidate the three HARD-GATE blocks into a single gated checkpoint referenced once, since the 'STOP and wait for explicit approval' directive is already reinforced by the Checklist and Process Flow diagram.

Dedupe the 'do not invoke writing-plans / any other skill until confirmed' instruction, which currently appears in both the Checklist and the 'After the Design' section.

Tighten the Dialogue and Key Principles sections, which restate guidance (e.g., one-question-at-a-time, 2-3 approaches) already covered earlier in the Checklist.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body assumes Claude's competence (no concept lecturing) but pads via repetition: the HARD-GATE appears three times and the 'STOP and wait for explicit approval' directive is restated across the Checklist, Process Flow, Dialogue, and After-the-Design sections, so it 'could be tightened' rather than having every token earn its place.

2 / 3

Actionability

Concrete, executable guidance throughout — an exact detection command ('git worktree list --porcelain | grep -A2 "$(pwd)"'), a concrete file path ('docs/plans/YYYY-MM-DD-<topic>-design.md'), and a branch-naming rule ('feature/ prefix, kebab-case') — matching the 'fully executable...copy-paste ready' anchor; absence of code is fine for this instruction-only skill.

3 / 3

Workflow Clarity

A clear 10-step numbered sequence with explicit validation checkpoints (three HARD-GATE approval gates), a revise-and-re-present feedback loop, a visual process-flow diagram, and dedicated re-entry handling — matching the 'clear sequence with explicit validation steps; feedback loops for error recovery' anchor.

3 / 3

Progressive Disclosure

A single self-contained file with no bundle references (verified: no references/scripts/assets directories exist) and clean section headings providing easy navigation; nothing needs externalizing, so per the simple-skills note the well-organized structure merits a high score rather than the 'content that should be separate is inline' level below.

3 / 3

Total

11

/

12

Passed

Description

100%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A strong, well-rounded description that names concrete actions, provides explicit positive and negative triggers in natural language, and carves out a clear niche distinct from implementation skills. Third-person voice is used throughout with no over-claims.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Lists multiple concrete coordinated actions — 'explore requirements, analyze codebase context, and produce an approved design document with trade-offs' — matching the 'lists multiple specific concrete actions' anchor rather than the partial 'names domain and some actions' level below.

3 / 3

Completeness

Explicitly answers both what ('Coordinates collaborative design sessions...produce an approved design document') and when ('Use when building a new feature...'), plus a negative trigger ('DO NOT TRIGGER when...'), matching the 'clearly answers both what AND when' anchor.

3 / 3

Trigger Term Quality

Uses natural user phrases ('building a new feature, adding functionality, creating components, modifying behavior, starting a project, or planning any creative work') giving good coverage of terms a user would actually say, beyond the 'some relevant keywords but missing common variations' level.

3 / 3

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The 'DO NOT TRIGGER when the user already has a concrete design and just wants implementation' carve-out gives a clear niche and distinguishes it from implementation skills, matching the 'clear niche with distinct triggers; unlikely to conflict' anchor.

3 / 3

Total

12

/

12

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository
shousper/claude-kit
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.