Content
77%Weight 40%Scale 1-3Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is highly actionable and clearly sequenced with strong validation gates, but it front-loads a bulky actor catalog inline and references a script file that is not present in the bundle, limiting its progressive-disclosure quality.
Suggestions
Move the per-platform actor catalog tables into a reference file (e.g. references/actors.md) and keep SKILL.md as an overview that links to it one level deep.
Ensure the referenced ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/reference/scripts/run_actor.js actually exists under references/scripts/, or correct the path so the bundle structure matches the body.
Tighten the catalog by collapsing 'Best For' columns into a compact reference, reducing token weight while preserving discoverability.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Prose sections are tight and avoid explaining concepts Claude already knows, but the body inlines a large 55-actor catalog plus several reference tables that could be moved to a separate file, so it could be tightened. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | It provides fully executable, copy-paste-ready commands (mcpc tools-call invocations and `node --env-file=.env .../run_actor.js` with concrete flags and placeholders) plus real actor IDs and a search fallback. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear 5-step sequence with a copyable progress checklist, prerequisites, an explicit cost/approval checkpoint before paid runs, and an error-handling section provide explicit validation steps and feedback loops. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Sections are well organized, but content that should be separate (the full actor catalog) is inlined, and the one referenced script path (${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/reference/scripts/run_actor.js) has no corresponding references/scripts/ directory in the bundle. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |