competitor-alternatives

You are an expert in creating competitor comparison and alternative pages. Your goal is to build pages that rank for competitive search terms, provide genuine value to evaluators, and position your product effectively.

Quality

—

Does it follow best practices?

Impact

—

No eval scenarios have been run

Securityby

Advisory

Suggest reviewing before use

Quality

Content

64%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The skill is a thorough, actionable instruction set with strong templates and schemas for competitor comparison pages. Its weaknesses are token bloat from extensive placeholder templates in a single file and the absence of validation steps or a multi-file progressive-disclosure structure.

Suggestions

Move the large per-competitor YAML schema and section templates into a referenced file (e.g. references/templates.md) and keep SKILL.md as an overview, improving both conciseness and progressive disclosure.

Add explicit validation checkpoints to the page-generation workflow (e.g. verify competitor data completeness, check pricing accuracy, validate internal links before publishing) to lift workflow clarity.

Trim placeholder-heavy template blocks to the essential structure rather than full repeated scaffolding for every section type.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Conciseness	The body is lengthy (~750 lines) and much of it is template fill-in scaffolding with placeholder brackets, but it largely avoids explaining concepts Claude already knows and stays focused on the task's structure.	2 / 3
Actionability	Provides concrete, copy-paste-ready templates: competitor data YAML schema, markdown section templates, comparison-table formats, URL patterns, and keyword tables that Claude can directly populate.	3 / 3
Workflow Clarity	Sequences are present (page formats, research process, content architecture) but there are no validation checkpoints or feedback loops for a batch-publishing operation, and the closing 'When to Use'/'Limitations' are generic rather than process-embedded.	2 / 3
Progressive Disclosure	Content is well-organized into sections but is entirely inline in one monolithic file with no references to separate files, so there is no progressive disclosure structure to navigate.	2 / 3
	Total	9 / 12 Passed

Description

50%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description identifies a clear SEO niche but stays at the goal level rather than naming concrete actions, and lacks an explicit 'Use when...' trigger clause. It uses second-person voice ('Your goal'), which under the rubric reduces specificity by 1 — reflected in the specificity score.

Suggestions

Add concrete verbs the skill performs, e.g. 'Build competitor comparison pages, alternatives lists, and vs-pages from centralized competitor data, with comparison tables and migration sections.'

Add an explicit trigger clause: 'Use when creating competitor comparison, alternative, or vs pages for SEO, or when the user asks for X vs Y / alternatives to X content.'

Rewrite in third person ('Builds competitor comparison pages...') to follow skill description conventions and avoid the second-person voice.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Specificity	Names the domain (competitor comparison/alternative pages) and broad goals (rank, provide value, position product), but lists no concrete actions like 'build comparison tables', 'generate migration sections', or 'create index pages'.	2 / 3
Completeness	Answers 'what' (build pages that rank/provide value/position product) but provides no explicit 'Use when...' trigger clause, so 'when' is only implied.	2 / 3
Trigger Term Quality	Contains relevant natural terms ('competitor comparison', 'alternative pages', 'rank for competitive search terms'), but lacks common variations users would say ('competitor pages', 'vs pages', 'compare to X', 'alternatives to X').	2 / 3
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk	The niche (competitor comparison/alternative SEO pages) is fairly specific and distinct from generic copywriting, but the broad framing ('creating competitor comparison and alternative pages') could overlap with general SEO/copywriting skills.	2 / 3
	Total	8 / 12 Passed

Validation

87%

Warnings & errors only

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 14 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

Criteria	Description	Result
skill_md_line_count	SKILL.md is long (762 lines); consider splitting into references/ and linking	Warning
frontmatter_unknown_keys	Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata	Warning

	Total	14 / 16 Passed

Repository: sickn33/antigravity-awesome-skills
Commit: 5e71bba

Reviewed: about 16 hours ago

Table of Contents

Discovery Implementation Validation

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.