concise-planning

Use when a user asks for a plan for a coding task, to generate a clear, actionable, and atomic checklist.

Quality

76%

Does it follow best practices?

Impact

—

No eval scenarios have been run

Securityby

Passed

No known issues

Optimize this skill with Tessl

npx tessl skill review --optimize ./skills/concise-planning/SKILL.md

Quality

Content

85%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

This is a well-structured, concise planning skill that clearly defines a workflow and output format. Its main weakness is the lack of a concrete, filled-in example showing what a completed plan looks like for a real task, which would significantly improve actionability. The boilerplate 'When to Use' and 'Limitations' sections at the end add minimal value and feel templated.

Suggestions

Add one concrete, filled-in example plan (e.g., 'Add user authentication to a Flask app') showing exactly what the output should look like with real file names and specific action items.

Remove or tighten the generic 'When to Use' and 'Limitations' sections, which read as boilerplate and don't add skill-specific value.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Conciseness	The skill is lean and efficient. It avoids explaining what planning is or why checklists matter—concepts Claude already knows. Every section serves a purpose, and the template is compact yet complete.	3 / 3
Actionability	The plan template and checklist guidelines provide concrete structure, but the steps are still somewhat abstract (e.g., 'Read README.md, docs, and relevant code files' lacks specifics on how to identify relevant files). The template uses placeholder text rather than a filled-in concrete example showing a real planning scenario.	2 / 3
Workflow Clarity	The three-step workflow (Scan Context → Minimal Interaction → Generate Plan) is clearly sequenced and unambiguous. The plan template includes a validation step, and the workflow is simple enough that no additional feedback loops are needed for this non-destructive task.	3 / 3
Progressive Disclosure	For a simple, single-purpose skill under 50 lines with no bundle files, the content is well-organized into clear sections (Workflow, Template, Guidelines, Limitations) without being monolithic. No external references are needed.	3 / 3
	Total	11 / 12 Passed

Description

67%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description has a clear 'Use when...' clause that explicitly defines the trigger condition, which is a strength. However, it lacks specificity in what concrete actions the skill performs beyond generating a checklist, and the trigger terms could be broader to capture more natural user phrasings. The description is concise but could benefit from more detail about what makes this skill distinct from general coding assistance.

Suggestions

Add more specific concrete actions beyond 'generate a checklist', e.g., 'Breaks down coding tasks into atomic steps, estimates complexity, identifies dependencies, and produces a numbered checklist.'

Expand trigger terms to include natural variations users might say, such as 'implementation plan', 'task breakdown', 'step-by-step plan', 'todo list', or 'roadmap'.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Specificity	The description names the domain ('coding task') and one action ('generate a clear, actionable, and atomic checklist'), but 'clear, actionable, and atomic' are quality adjectives rather than concrete distinct actions. It doesn't list multiple specific capabilities beyond checklist generation.	2 / 3
Completeness	The description explicitly answers both 'what' (generate a clear, actionable, and atomic checklist) and 'when' (when a user asks for a plan for a coding task), with the 'Use when...' clause present as an explicit trigger.	3 / 3
Trigger Term Quality	Includes some relevant keywords like 'plan', 'coding task', and 'checklist' that users might naturally say, but misses common variations such as 'todo list', 'task breakdown', 'implementation plan', 'step-by-step', or 'roadmap'.	2 / 3
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk	The focus on coding task planning checklists is somewhat specific, but 'coding task' is broad enough that it could overlap with general coding assistance skills, code review skills, or project management skills. The checklist angle helps but doesn't fully disambiguate.	2 / 3
	Total	9 / 12 Passed

Validation

90%

Warnings & errors only

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 10 / 11 Passed

Validation for skill structure

Criteria	Description	Result
frontmatter_unknown_keys	Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata	Warning

	Total	10 / 11 Passed

Repository: sickn33/antigravity-awesome-skills
Commit: 88d1e11

Reviewed: 5 days ago

Table of Contents

Discovery Implementation Validation

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.