concise-planning
Use when a user asks for a plan for a coding task, to generate a clear, actionable, and atomic checklist.
83
76%
Does it follow best practices?
Impact
97%
1.46xAverage score across 3 eval scenarios
Passed
No known issues
Optimize this skill with Tessl
npx tessl skill review --optimize ./skills/concise-planning/SKILL.mdQuality
Discovery
67%Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.
The description has a clear 'Use when...' clause that explicitly defines the trigger condition, which is its strongest aspect. However, it lacks specificity in describing concrete capabilities beyond checklist generation and misses common natural language variations users might employ when requesting planning help. The description would benefit from more specific actions and broader trigger term coverage.
Suggestions
Add more specific concrete actions, e.g., 'Breaks down coding tasks into atomic steps, estimates complexity, identifies dependencies, and generates ordered checklists'.
Expand trigger terms to include natural variations like 'task breakdown', 'implementation steps', 'todo list', 'work items', or 'how to approach this code change'.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Specificity | The description names the domain ('coding task') and one action ('generate a clear, actionable, and atomic checklist'), but 'clear, actionable, and atomic' are quality adjectives rather than concrete distinct actions. It doesn't list multiple specific capabilities beyond checklist generation. | 2 / 3 |
Completeness | The description explicitly answers both 'what' (generate a clear, actionable, and atomic checklist) and 'when' (when a user asks for a plan for a coding task), with the 'Use when...' clause present as an explicit trigger. | 3 / 3 |
Trigger Term Quality | Includes some relevant keywords like 'plan', 'coding task', and 'checklist', but misses common variations users might say such as 'todo list', 'task breakdown', 'implementation plan', 'steps', 'roadmap', or 'work items'. | 2 / 3 |
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk | The focus on coding task planning checklists is somewhat specific, but 'plan for a coding task' could overlap with general project management skills, code review skills, or broader planning/task management skills. The niche is not sharply defined enough to fully avoid conflicts. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 9 / 12 Passed |
Implementation
85%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
This is a well-structured, concise planning skill that clearly defines a workflow and provides a usable template. Its main weakness is the lack of a concrete, filled-in example showing how a real user request maps to a completed plan, which would elevate actionability. The 'When to Use' section is vague and adds little value.
Suggestions
Add one concrete worked example showing a real user request (e.g., 'Add authentication to the API') mapped to a fully filled-in plan template to boost actionability.
Replace or remove the vague 'When to Use' section ('This skill is applicable to execute the workflow or actions described in the overview') with something specific or drop it entirely to maintain conciseness.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The content is lean and efficient. Every section serves a purpose, there's no explanation of concepts Claude already knows, and the template is compact yet complete. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | The plan template and checklist guidelines provide concrete structure, but the guidance remains somewhat abstract—there are no real-world examples of a completed plan (e.g., an actual user request mapped to a filled-in template). The template uses placeholders rather than a concrete worked example. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The three-step workflow (Scan Context → Minimal Interaction → Generate Plan) is clearly sequenced and unambiguous. The plan template includes a validation step, and the process is simple enough that no additional feedback loops are needed for this non-destructive task. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | For a skill under 50 lines with a single purpose, the content is well-organized into logical sections (Workflow, Template, Guidelines, When to Use) with no need for external references. Navigation is straightforward. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |
Validation
90%Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.
Validation — 10 / 11 Passed
Validation for skill structure
| Criteria | Description | Result |
|---|---|---|
frontmatter_unknown_keys | Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata | Warning |
Total | 10 / 11 Passed | |
- Repository
- sickn33/antigravity-awesome-skills
- Commit
6a07b83
- Reviewed
Table of Contents
Is this your skill?
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.