backend-to-frontend-handoff-docs
Create API handoff documentation for frontend developers. Use when backend work is complete and needs to be documented for frontend integration, or user says 'create handoff', 'document API', 'frontend handoff', or 'API documentation'.
Install with Tessl CLI
npx tessl i github:softaworks/agent-toolkit --skill backend-to-frontend-handoff-docs85
Does it follow best practices?
If you maintain this skill, you can automatically optimize it using the tessl CLI to improve its score:
npx tessl skill review --optimize ./path/to/skillValidation for skill structure
Discovery
89%Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.
This is a well-structured skill description with excellent trigger term coverage and clear 'when to use' guidance. The main weakness is the lack of specific concrete actions beyond 'create' - it would benefit from listing what the documentation actually includes (endpoints, schemas, examples, etc.).
Suggestions
Add 2-3 specific actions describing what the documentation includes, e.g., 'Create API handoff documentation including endpoint specifications, request/response schemas, and integration examples'
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Specificity | Names the domain (API handoff documentation) and the target audience (frontend developers), but only describes one action ('Create'). Lacks specific concrete actions like 'generate endpoint specs, document request/response schemas, create example payloads'. | 2 / 3 |
Completeness | Clearly answers both what ('Create API handoff documentation for frontend developers') and when ('Use when backend work is complete... or user says') with explicit trigger phrases listed. | 3 / 3 |
Trigger Term Quality | Excellent coverage of natural trigger terms users would say: 'create handoff', 'document API', 'frontend handoff', 'API documentation'. Also includes contextual trigger 'backend work is complete'. | 3 / 3 |
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk | Clear niche focusing specifically on API handoff documentation for frontend integration. The combination of 'handoff', 'frontend', and 'API documentation' creates a distinct trigger profile unlikely to conflict with general documentation or API skills. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |
Implementation
77%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
This is a well-crafted skill with strong actionability—the complete template with concrete examples (TypeScript types, JSON payloads, tables) gives Claude everything needed to produce quality handoff docs. The workflow is clear with appropriate validation steps. Main weakness is moderate verbosity with some redundant framing that could be tightened.
Suggestions
Remove redundant goal statements—the intro paragraph, Goal section, and Output Format intro all say similar things; consolidate into one concise statement
Consider extracting the full template to a separate TEMPLATE.md file and keeping only a condensed overview in the main skill to improve progressive disclosure
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The skill is mostly efficient but includes some redundancy—the goal is restated multiple times (intro, Goal section, Output Format intro), and some explanations like 'produce a copy-paste-ready handoff document' could be trimmed since Claude understands the purpose from context. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides a complete, copy-paste-ready markdown template with concrete examples (TypeScript interface, JSON request/response shapes, table format for enums). The workflow steps are specific and the output format is fully executable. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear 4-step workflow with explicit sequencing (collect context → create file → fill template → double-check). Includes validation checkpoint ('Double-check') and file versioning guidance for iterations. The 'Simple API shortcut' provides appropriate branching for simpler cases. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Content is well-structured with clear headers and the template is appropriately detailed inline since it's the core deliverable. However, the skill is somewhat long (~100 lines) and could benefit from separating the full template into a referenced file while keeping a condensed overview in the main skill. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |
Validation
87%Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.
Validation — 14 / 16 Passed
Validation for skill structure
| Criteria | Description | Result |
|---|---|---|
metadata_version | 'metadata' field is not a dictionary | Warning |
license_field | 'license' field is missing | Warning |
Total | 14 / 16 Passed | |
- Reviewed
Table of Contents
Is this your skill?
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.