Content
73%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, actionable skill body with an explicit workflow, validation checkpoints, and a genuine one-level-deep reference file. Its main weakness is redundancy — trigger lists, output summaries, and notes each appear twice — which inflates token cost without adding guidance.
Suggestions
Remove the "When to Use This Skill" section (it duplicates the frontmatter description's triggers verbatim) or reduce it to the RFC-vs-TDD decision rule alone.
Merge "Output Summary Format" into "Step 5: Offer Next Steps" — the two blocks are near-identical and both would be sent after generation.
Consolidate "Important Notes" into the Quality Checklist and move the BAD/GOOD anti-pattern examples with stub placeholders into references/section-templates.md alongside the section templates.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly useful, but several sections are duplicated: "When to Use This Skill" repeats the frontmatter triggers, "Output Summary Format" nearly restates "Step 5: Offer Next Steps", and "Important Notes" re-iterates checklist items ("Do nothing" is an option, language adaptation). This matches 'mostly efficient but could be tightened'; it is not 4 because the duplication is systematic rather than minor. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete, executable guidance throughout: a mandatory-field checklist, a copy-paste AskQuestion JSON block, a typed section-tailoring table, BAD/GOOD contrast examples, and a pre-finalize quality checklist. Not 5: some guidance (section templates) lives in the reference file and the anti-pattern GOOD examples are stubs ("[genuine pros and cons]") rather than worked examples. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Five clearly sequenced steps (gather context, validate mandatory fields, detect type, generate, offer next steps) with an explicit validation checkpoint ("MANDATORY fields — ask if missing") and a pre-finalize "RFC Quality Checklist". This is an instruction-only, non-destructive skill, so the batch/destructive cap does not apply, and the content matches the top anchor's sequence + validation + checklist. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The single bundle reference is real, clearly signaled, and one level deep ("Read references/section-templates.md when generating an RFC document. It contains complete Markdown templates for all 11 sections"), verified to exist and contain those templates. Not 5: the body still inlines sizable template-like content (two near-identical output-summary blocks, the AskQuestion JSON) that could sit in the reference, and only one reference file splits the ~300-line body. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |