CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

create-rfc

Creates structured Request for Comments (RFC) documents for proposing and deciding on significant changes. Use when the user says "write an RFC", "create a proposal", "I need to propose a change", "draft an RFC", "document a decision", or needs stakeholder alignment before making a major technical or process decision. Do NOT use for TDDs/implementation docs (use technical-design-doc-creator instead), README files, or general documentation.

72

Quality

Does it follow best practices?

Impact

No eval scenarios have been run

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No known issues

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

77%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is well structured and actionable with a clear validated workflow and a properly referenced templates file, but it carries verbosity and inline detail that could be externalized. Tightening redundant sections and moving peripheral content to the references file would raise conciseness and progressive disclosure.

Suggestions

Move the "Common Anti-Patterns to Avoid", "Output Summary Format", and multilingual "Example Prompts that Trigger This Skill" sections into references/section-templates.md or a separate file, keeping SKILL.md as a lean overview.

Trim the "Important Notes" bullet list, which largely restates guidance already implied by the workflow and checklist, to reduce token overhead.

Consolidate the duplicate trigger phrasing between the "When to Use This Skill" list and the example-prompt section so the trigger surface is stated once.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

Mostly efficient but padded with content that could be trimmed or externalized, such as the RFC vs TDD table, the BAD/GOOD anti-pattern blocks, the Important Notes list, and three-language example-prompt sections that restate trigger terms already in the description.

2 / 3

Actionability

Provides concrete executable guidance: an exact AskQuestion JSON payload, an explicit mandatory-field list, an RFC-type table, a quality checklist, and a real referenced templates file, so Claude knows precisely what to do.

3 / 3

Workflow Clarity

The Interactive Workflow is a clearly sequenced Steps 1-5 with a mandatory-field validation checkpoint in Step 2 and a quality checklist as a pre-finalization validation step.

3 / 3

Progressive Disclosure

It correctly externalizes heavy template content to a real one-level-deep reference (references/section-templates.md), but keeps sizable inline material (anti-patterns, output summary, three-language example prompts, RFC vs TDD table) that could be split out for tighter navigation.

2 / 3

Total

10

/

12

Passed

Description

100%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A strong, third-person description that states concrete capabilities, provides rich natural trigger terms, and answers both what and when with explicit exclusions. It is distinct from neighboring documentation skills and unlikely to misfire.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Lists multiple concrete actions such as "Creates structured Request for Comments (RFC) documents" and "proposing and deciding on significant changes", matching the multiple-specific-actions anchor.

3 / 3

Completeness

Clearly answers both what it does and when to use it via an explicit "Use when..." clause, and adds "Do NOT use for..." exclusions, matching the highest anchor.

3 / 3

Trigger Term Quality

Natural trigger phrases users would actually say are well covered ("write an RFC", "create a proposal", "draft an RFC", "document a decision") plus explicit negative triggers.

3 / 3

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Has a clear RFC niche with distinct triggers and explicit exclusions redirecting TDDs to "technical-design-doc-creator", making overlap with other skills unlikely.

3 / 3

Total

12

/

12

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository
tech-leads-club/agent-skills
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.