Content
70%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is a well-structured overview that practices good progressive disclosure and has a clear review workflow. Its main weaknesses are repeated step lists that reduce conciseness and actionability guidance that depends on an external reference file rather than being self-contained.
Suggestions
Consolidate the near-duplicate step lists in "How It Works" and "Usage" into a single workflow section to remove repetition and improve conciseness.
Add one or two concrete example findings in the `file:line` output format in the body so the guidance is actionable without requiring the reference file.
Use one consistent reference syntax (either the `#[[file:...]]` form or a plain relative path) throughout the body to avoid the current inconsistency.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and explains no background concepts, but it restates essentially the same four-step process (read guidelines, read files, apply rules, output findings) in both "How It Works" and "Usage", which could be tightened; this sits below the fully-lean score-3 anchor and above the verbose score-1 anchor. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | It gives some concrete directives (read from a specific path, output in `file:line` format, group by file), but the actual executable review rules are externalized to the reference file rather than being self-contained in the body, matching the "some concrete guidance but incomplete" anchor. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The sequence (read guidelines, read files, check rules, output findings) is clear and unambiguous, and includes a user-interaction checkpoint ("If no files specified, ask the user"); as a read-only review task it has no destructive or batch operations that would require validation, so it is not capped at 2. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is a concise overview that delegates all detailed rules to a single one-level-deep, clearly signaled reference at references/guideline.md (verified to exist), with a topic list aiding discovery, matching the clear-overview-with-well-signaled-references anchor. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |