Content
65%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
Highly actionable content with strong executable examples, weighed down by repetition, a dated Learnings recap, and the absence of validation checkpoints or bundle files for content that would benefit from separation.
Suggestions
Add an explicit validation/verification step after batch or destructive operations (e.g., 'After --yolo runs, diff and run tests before reporting done') to lift workflow_clarity past the cap.
Consolidate the PTY guidance into one section and remove the 'Learnings (Jan 2026)' recap that repeats already-stated points, to reduce token weight.
Split per-agent CLI details and the dated learnings into reference files (e.g. references/agents.md, references/learnings.md) so SKILL.md stays a lean overview.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly efficient with tables and copy-paste blocks, but the PTY point is repeated across multiple sections, the 'Learnings (Jan 2026)' block restates already-covered material, and jokey asides add tokens that could be trimmed. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Fully executable guidance: concrete exec_command invocations with real flags, parameter/session-tool tables, and copy-paste bash blocks covering one-shot, background, PR review, and parallel cases. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Sequences (start -> monitor -> input -> kill) are present, but batch/destructive operations (parallel PR review, --yolo, kill_session) lack explicit validation or verification checkpoints, so the workflow_clarity cap of 3 applies. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist, so ~280 lines covering four agents, PR review, parallel worktrees, rules, and a learnings archive are all inlined; clear section headers provide structure, but per-agent detail and the dated Learnings section read like content that belongs in separate files. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 14 / 20 Passed |