Extract text from images using Tesseract OCR
59
Quality
48%
Does it follow best practices?
Impact
Pending
No eval scenarios have been run
Advisory
Suggest reviewing before use
Optimize this skill with Tessl
npx tessl skill review --optimize ./examples/skill/skills/ocr/SKILL.mdQuality
Discovery
32%Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.
The description is functional but minimal, clearly identifying the core capability (OCR with Tesseract) but lacking explicit trigger guidance and comprehensive keyword coverage. The absence of a 'Use when...' clause significantly limits Claude's ability to know when to select this skill over alternatives.
Suggestions
Add a 'Use when...' clause with explicit triggers like 'Use when the user wants to extract text from images, screenshots, scanned documents, or mentions OCR, image-to-text, or reading text from pictures.'
Include common file format triggers users might mention: '.png', '.jpg', '.jpeg', '.tiff', 'screenshot', 'scanned document', 'photo of text'
Expand the action list to be more specific: 'Extract text from images, process scanned documents, convert screenshots to editable text using Tesseract OCR'
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Specificity | Names the domain (images, OCR) and one action (extract text), but doesn't list multiple concrete actions like handling different image formats, batch processing, or output options. | 2 / 3 |
Completeness | Describes what it does (extract text from images) but completely lacks a 'Use when...' clause or any explicit trigger guidance for when Claude should select this skill. | 1 / 3 |
Trigger Term Quality | Includes 'images', 'Tesseract', and 'OCR' which are relevant keywords, but misses common variations users might say like 'scan', 'read text from picture', 'image to text', '.png', '.jpg', or 'screenshot'. | 2 / 3 |
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk | Mentioning 'Tesseract OCR' specifically helps distinguish it from other text extraction tools, but 'extract text from images' could overlap with other image processing or document extraction skills. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 7 / 12 Passed |
Implementation
64%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
This skill provides clear, actionable commands for OCR text extraction with good coverage of common use cases. However, it includes some unnecessary reference material (language codes, format lists) that Claude already knows, and lacks validation/error handling guidance for when OCR produces poor results.
Suggestions
Remove or significantly trim the language codes table and supported formats list - Claude knows these
Add validation guidance: how to check OCR quality, handle low-confidence results, or retry with preprocessing if output is poor
Move installation instructions to a separate SETUP.md file since they're one-time setup, not operational guidance
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The content is mostly efficient but includes some unnecessary sections like the full language table and supported formats list that Claude already knows. The capabilities section is somewhat redundant given the usage examples. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides fully executable bash commands with clear examples covering basic usage, language options, preprocessing, and URL handling. All commands are copy-paste ready with concrete file paths and flags. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | This is a simple single-command tool, but lacks validation guidance. No mention of how to verify OCR success, handle errors, or check output quality. For a tool that can produce poor results on low-quality images, some validation guidance would help. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Content is reasonably organized with clear sections, but everything is inline in one file. The installation section and language table could be referenced externally. No links to additional resources or advanced documentation. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 9 / 12 Passed |
Validation
100%Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.
Validation — 11 / 11 Passed
Validation for skill structure
No warnings or errors.
50ef2f3
Table of Contents
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.