Content
93%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a tight, well-structured, fully executable skill: it gives copy-paste commands, references a real bundle script, and avoids over-explanation. The only minor gap is the absence of any validation/output-directory guidance for file-writing examples.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean with no padding or explanation of concepts Claude already knows: a one-line overview, two executable command examples, and an output-files list, matching the score-5 anchor ("Lean and efficient; assumes Claude's competence; every token earns its place"). It is not a 4 because there is no over-explanation to trim. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Both examples give copy-paste-ready commands ("python3 scripts/fib.py 10 > out/fib.txt" and a heredoc summing stdin), and the referenced scripts/fib.py exists and is executable, matching the score-5 anchor. It is not a 4 because the guidance is fully executable with no gaps. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | For a simple single-action skill the command invocation is unambiguous and clearly presented, sitting above the score-3 anchor. It is not a 5 because there are no validation/checkpoint steps and the example does not address creating the out/ directory, a minor gap. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is under 50 lines with well-organized sections (Overview, Examples, Output Files) and a one-level reference to a real bundle file (scripts/fib.py), matching the simple-skill exception allowing a 5 with well-organized sections. It is not a 4 because organization is clean with no nested or buried references. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |