swiftui-pro
Comprehensively reviews SwiftUI code for best practices on modern APIs, maintainability, and performance. Use when reading, writing, or reviewing SwiftUI projects.
68
81%
Does it follow best practices?
Impact
—
No eval scenarios have been run
Passed
No known issues
Quality
Discovery
75%Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.
The description is well-structured with a clear 'what' and 'when' clause, and targets a distinct niche (SwiftUI code review). Its main weakness is that the capabilities described are somewhat high-level—terms like 'best practices' and 'maintainability' are broad rather than listing specific concrete actions. Trigger terms could also be expanded to cover more natural user phrasings.
Suggestions
Add specific concrete actions such as 'identifies deprecated APIs, suggests state management improvements, optimizes view hierarchies, and recommends modern SwiftUI patterns'.
Expand trigger terms to include natural variations like 'Swift views', 'iOS UI', '@State/@Binding patterns', or 'SwiftUI modifiers'.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Specificity | Names the domain (SwiftUI code) and some areas of focus (best practices, modern APIs, maintainability, performance), but doesn't list specific concrete actions like 'refactor view hierarchies', 'optimize state management', or 'migrate deprecated modifiers'. | 2 / 3 |
Completeness | Clearly answers both what ('reviews SwiftUI code for best practices on modern APIs, maintainability, and performance') and when ('Use when reading, writing, or reviewing SwiftUI projects') with an explicit trigger clause. | 3 / 3 |
Trigger Term Quality | Includes 'SwiftUI' which is a strong natural keyword, and 'reviewing' and 'best practices' are relevant. However, it misses common variations users might say like 'iOS UI code', 'Swift views', '@State', '@Binding', 'view modifiers', or '.swift files'. | 2 / 3 |
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk | The focus on SwiftUI specifically creates a clear niche that is unlikely to conflict with general code review skills or other language-specific skills. The combination of SwiftUI + best practices + modern APIs is quite distinctive. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |
Implementation
87%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
This is a well-crafted skill that efficiently communicates a comprehensive SwiftUI code review process. Its strengths are excellent progressive disclosure through reference files, concrete before/after code examples, and a lean writing style that respects Claude's intelligence. The main weakness is the lack of explicit validation checkpoints in the workflow—there's no step to verify that suggested fixes compile or that the review is complete.
Suggestions
Add a validation checkpoint after generating fixes, such as 'Verify each before/after code snippet compiles independently before including it in the output.'
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The content is lean and efficient. Every section serves a purpose—no unnecessary explanations of what SwiftUI is or how code review works. Core instructions are terse bullet points, and the example output demonstrates rather than explains. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | The skill provides a concrete 9-step review process with specific reference files, clear output format with before/after code examples, and executable Swift code snippets that demonstrate exactly what to do. The example output is copy-paste ready and shows the expected pattern. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The 9-step review process is clearly sequenced and covers partial review scenarios. However, there are no explicit validation checkpoints or feedback loops—e.g., no step to verify fixes compile, no guidance on what to do if issues conflict, and no checkpoint between finding issues and reporting them. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Excellent progressive disclosure: the SKILL.md serves as a clear overview with well-signaled one-level-deep references to 9 specific reference files. Each reference is listed with a brief description, and the review process tells you exactly which file to consult for each step. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |
Validation
100%Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.
Validation — 11 / 11 Passed
Validation for skill structure
No warnings or errors.
- Repository
- twostraws/SwiftUI-Agent-Skill
- Commit
be297ff
- Reviewed
Table of Contents
Is this your skill?
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.