Conciseness

The body is efficient — tables for directory and naming conventions, four copy-paste TypeScript templates, and exact run commands, with no explanation of concepts Claude already knows. It is not 5 because the generic "Best Practices" items ("Keep examples focused", "Add comments for complex logic") and some "Utility Helpers" repetition could be trimmed.

Actionability

Guidance is fully executable: complete templates for the common cases (basic, streaming, tool calling, structured output) plus exact commands like "pnpm tsx src/generate-text/openai/basic.ts" and concrete naming patterns with worked examples. The providerName/model-id placeholders are explicitly justified flexibility (provider varies), not gaps, matching anchor 5.

Workflow Clarity

The bug-reproduction workflow is clearly sequenced with an explicit verification loop ("Use a temporary script... to reproduce the failure end-to-end, then rerun it to verify the fix" and document before/after), and "When to Write Examples" gives decision guidance. It is not 5 because the primary example-authoring workflow lacks an explicit checkpoint to run and confirm the new example works.

Progressive Disclosure

No bundle files exist, so all content lives in a single SKILL.md; it is well-sectioned with clear headers, scannable tables, and clearly signaled external pointers (AGENTS.md bug-fix workflow, capture-api-response-test-fixture skill). This matches anchor 4's good structure with minor organization gaps; it does not meet the simple-skill exception for 5 since the file is well over 50 lines and the four inline templates could plausibly live in reference files.

Specificity

Quotes like "Develop examples for AI SDK functions", "creating, running, or modifying examples", "validate provider support", and "create test fixtures" list several concrete actions and purposes, matching the anchor for several specific actions with minor gaps. It is not 5 because "demonstrate features" is generic and the action list is not fully comprehensive.

Completeness

It explicitly answers both: the "what" ("Develop examples for AI SDK functions") and a concrete "when" ("Use when creating, running, or modifying examples under examples/ai-functions/src to validate provider support, demonstrate features, or create test fixtures") with specific trigger conditions. Anchor 4's caveat that the "when" could be more explicit does not apply here.

Trigger Term Quality

Natural terms such as "examples", "AI SDK functions", "provider support", and "test fixtures" give good keyword coverage, matching anchor 4. It falls short of anchor 5's comprehensive synonym/extension coverage because the function names users would actually say (e.g., generateText, streamText) and provider names are absent.

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The trigger is pinned to a specific location and purpose ("examples under examples/ai-functions/src to validate provider support"), giving it a clear niche with distinct triggers and minimal conflict risk, matching anchor 5. It is not merely "mostly distinct" as in anchor 4.