arxiv
Search, download, and summarize academic papers from arXiv. Use when user says "search arxiv", "download paper", "fetch arxiv", "arxiv search", "get paper pdf", or wants to find and save papers from arXiv to the local paper library.
89
88%
Does it follow best practices?
Impact
Pending
No eval scenarios have been run
Advisory
Suggest reviewing before use
Quality
Discovery
100%Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.
This is a strong skill description that clearly defines its scope (arXiv paper search, download, and summarization), provides explicit trigger phrases covering natural user language variations, and has a well-defined 'Use when' clause. The description is concise, uses third person voice, and is highly distinctive with minimal conflict risk.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Specificity | Lists multiple specific concrete actions: 'Search, download, and summarize academic papers from arXiv.' These are clear, distinct operations on a well-defined domain. | 3 / 3 |
Completeness | Clearly answers both what ('Search, download, and summarize academic papers from arXiv') and when ('Use when user says "search arxiv", "download paper"...or wants to find and save papers from arXiv to the local paper library'). | 3 / 3 |
Trigger Term Quality | Excellent coverage of natural trigger terms: 'search arxiv', 'download paper', 'fetch arxiv', 'arxiv search', 'get paper pdf', 'find and save papers'. These are phrases users would naturally say. | 3 / 3 |
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk | Highly distinctive with a clear niche focused on arXiv specifically. The trigger terms are domain-specific ('arxiv', 'paper pdf', 'paper library') and unlikely to conflict with general document or search skills. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 12 / 12 Passed |
Implementation
77%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
This is a well-crafted, highly actionable skill with a clear multi-step workflow and proper validation checkpoints for downloads. Its main weakness is verbosity from duplicated inline Python fallback code across multiple steps, which could be consolidated or moved to a referenced file. The skill effectively handles edge cases (rate limiting, file validation, both ID formats) and provides concrete output formats.
Suggestions
Consolidate the inline Python fallback code into a single referenced script or a single inline block with functions, rather than repeating similar urllib patterns across Steps 2, 3, and 4.
Move the full fallback Python implementations to a separate FALLBACK.md or inline-scripts reference file, keeping only the fetch-script invocation commands in the main workflow.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The skill is fairly long (~150 lines) with some redundancy between the fetch script and fallback inline Python shown for multiple steps. The inline Python code is repeated in slightly different forms across Steps 2, 3, and 4. However, most content is actionable rather than explanatory, and it doesn't over-explain concepts Claude already knows. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | The skill provides fully executable Python and bash code for every step—searching, fetching details, downloading PDFs—with complete fallback implementations. Commands are copy-paste ready with specific URLs, headers, timeout values, and output formats clearly specified. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The 6-step workflow is clearly sequenced with explicit validation checkpoints: file size verification (>10KB), rate limiting with retry logic (1s delay, retry on 429), skip-if-exists checks, and clear error reporting. The branching logic (ID vs query, script found vs fallback) is well-defined. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The content is well-structured with clear sections and headers, but it's monolithic—all inline Python fallback code is embedded directly rather than being referenced from a separate file. The fetch script is mentioned but the full fallback code bloats the main skill file. The follow-up skill suggestions at the end are a nice touch for navigation. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |
Validation
81%Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.
Validation — 9 / 11 Passed
Validation for skill structure
| Criteria | Description | Result |
|---|---|---|
allowed_tools_field | 'allowed-tools' contains unusual tool name(s) | Warning |
frontmatter_unknown_keys | Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata | Warning |
Total | 9 / 11 Passed | |
- Commit
dc00dfb
- Reviewed
Table of Contents
Is this your skill?
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.