Content
77%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-sequenced, highly actionable workflow with strong validation feedback loops, undermined only by length and a monolithic structure that keeps reference-worthy material inline. Splitting the report template and reference tables into bundle files would lift progressive disclosure.
Suggestions
Move the large use-case, inference-strategy, and DSE_REPORT template tables into files under references/ and link to them one level deep to improve progressive_disclosure.
Trim redundancy between the Workflow phases and the Key Rules section (e.g., never re-run a config, respect timeout) to recover conciseness.
Keep the safety rules and stopping-logic tables inline since they are needed every run, but consider collapsing the example invocations to two representative cases.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly efficient with concrete tables and structured phases, but at ~290 lines it carries redundancy (the Key Rules section reiterates Workflow points) and could be tightened; not quite 'every token earns its place'. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Gives concrete, copy-paste-ready guidance throughout — specific file paths, CSV/JSON formats, an inference-strategy table, and four example invocations — so Claude knows exactly what to produce. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Phases 0–4 are clearly sequenced with explicit validation checkpoints (stopping conditions, constraint checks, 'parse metrics programmatically') and a feedback loop for repeated crashes that re-validates metric comparability before resuming. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist and the content is a single ~290-line monolith with large inline tables (use cases, inference strategies, report template) that could be split into references; the only external link is the out-of-bundle shared-references file. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |