The body is operational and largely avoids explaining concepts Claude already knows, but at ~330 lines it is not lean — prose such as the sanity-failure reimplement paragraph and cross-references to other skills' docs could be tightened.

Provides concrete, executable commands (/run-experiment, /experiment-queue, git clone), a copy-paste spawn_agent review block, and explicit result/tracker markdown templates; placeholders like [experiment commands] are appropriate for a generator skill.

Six sequenced phases with explicit validation checkpoints (sanity-first, self-review checklist, code review, AUTO_DEPLOY checkpoint) and clear error-recovery feedback loops ('READ the traceback... then fix', discard-and-reimplement, second-opinion rescue).

Sections are well-organized and the shared-protocol references are one-level-deep and clearly signaled, but no bundle files exist and a large amount of content (full review-prompt block, backend lifecycle rules, result templates) is inline in a single monolithic file rather than split into referenced files.

Lists four concrete actions — 'Reads EXPERIMENT_PLAN.md', 'implements experiment code', 'deploys to GPU', 'collects initial results' — matching the multi-action anchor; it is not the level below because the actions are comprehensive and specific rather than naming only a domain.

Explicitly answers both 'what' (reads plan, implements code, deploys to GPU, collects results) and 'when' via an explicit 'Use when user says...' clause with concrete triggers.

Provides natural user phrasings across two languages — "implement experiments", "bridge", "deploy the plan", "实现实验", "从计划到跑实验" — giving good coverage of terms a user would actually say, not jargon.

Occupies a clear niche as the Workflow 1.5 implement+deploy+collect bridge with distinct triggers; unlikely to fire for unrelated skills, despite the slightly generic lone word 'bridge'.