Content
77%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A highly actionable, well-sequenced workflow with concrete prompts, tool calls, and validation checkpoints. Its main weaknesses are verbosity from repeating opt-in/non-blocking invariants and broken/missing shared-references bundle files that the body relies on.
Suggestions
Consolidate the repeated 'absent == unavailable == not blocking' explanations for deep-fix and restatement-check into a single canonical statement in Submission Artifact Emission, then reference it from Key Rules and the phase sections to remove the duplicated prose.
Create the referenced ../shared-references/*.md files (reviewer-routing.md, fan-out-pattern.md, assurance-contract.md, acceptance-gate.md, external-cadence.md, reviewer-independence.md) or remove the dangling links, since progressive disclosure depends on them resolving.
Move the long deep-fix prompt block, restatement-check algorithm, and JSON schema examples into dedicated reference files so the SKILL.md body stays a lean overview.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly domain-specific material Claude would not already know, but several invariants are re-explained multiple times — e.g., the 'absent == unavailable == not blocking' deep-fix/restatement semantics repeat across Phase 1, the Deep-Fix Mode section, Key Rules, and Submission Artifact Emission. It is accurate but could be tightened. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides exact reviewer prompts, exact MCP tool calls with configs, exact bash/compile commands, fix-record templates, and JSON schemas — copy-paste ready and fully executable, matching the score-3 anchor. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear phased sequence (Phase 0 through 5.5) with explicit validation checkpoints (acceptance gate, compile checks, blind re-review, regression audit) and feedback loops (repeat Phases 2-3 up to MAX_REVIEW_ROUNDS; re-enter Phase 2 on new issues), appropriate for batch .tex edits. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | References to ../shared-references/*.md (reviewer-routing, fan-out-pattern, assurance-contract, etc.) are clearly signaled and one-level-deep by design, but none of those files exist in the workspace (dangling links), and large blocks like the deep-fix prompt, restatement algorithm, and JSON schemas are inline rather than split into the referenced files. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |