Content
72%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is concise and well-structured with a single clearly signaled reference file, but it relies on abstract best-practice directives rather than concrete, executable steps and lacks an explicit workflow with validation checkpoints.
Suggestions
Add a concrete scaffold/extract/sync workflow with explicit commands or file-creation steps and a validation checkpoint (e.g., a consistency-checklist invocation) to lift workflow_clarity to 3.
Replace abstract directives with executable specifics — show the directory layout and a minimal product.md/tech-stack.md template inline or via the existing artifact-templates.md reference.
Include a brief validation/feedback loop (validate artifacts -> fix inconsistencies -> proceed) before major implementation work to satisfy the destructive/batch-operation guidance.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean, assumes Claude's competence, and avoids explaining what context artifacts are; every section earns its place with no padded background. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Guidance is mostly directional ('Always read relevant artifacts before starting work', 'Make incremental context changes') rather than executable commands or concrete templates, leaving key specifics to the referenced files. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | 'When to Use' and 'Best Practices' give sequence signals but there is no explicit multi-step workflow with validation checkpoints for the scaffold/extract/sync operations described in the description. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | A concise overview with a clearly signaled one-level-deep reference to references/details.md (and artifact-templates.md exists in the bundle), keeping the main file navigable. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |