Content
72%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body delivers highly actionable, executable contracts and a clean one-level reference split, but it is token-heavy from inlining two full contracts and offers no workflow guidance for choosing or deploying among the four templates.
Suggestions
Move the full inline staking and AMM contracts into references/ (keeping a brief overview plus one minimal inline example) to reduce SKILL.md's token weight and make the body a true overview.
Add a short workflow for using a template: which protocol to pick for a given goal, how to customize parameters (e.g., rewardRate, fee tiers), and how to compile/test before deploying.
Replace the "When to Use This Skill" bullets with something non-duplicative of the description, or fold them into deployment guidance, since they restate the frontmatter trigger list.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | There is no concept fluff, but two full ~200-line contracts are inlined in SKILL.md and the "When to Use This Skill" bullets duplicate the frontmatter description, so the body could be tightened by leaning more on references. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | The staking and AMM sections are complete, executable Solidity contracts with imports, events, and modifiers — copy-paste ready rather than pseudocode or vague direction. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Templates are organized by section, but with four protocols there is no guidance for selecting, deploying, customizing, or testing one, and no checkpoints for the multi-template set. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body signals a real, one-level-deep reference ("More detailed templates and worked examples live in references/details.md"), which exists and holds the governance and flash-loan templates, splitting content appropriately across files. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |