Content
92%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is concise, actionable, and clearly sequenced with explicit decision rules and a ready-to-use report template. The main gap is progressive disclosure — the dimension checklists live in references/review-dimensions.md but the body never explicitly points to them, so the split is under-signaled.
Suggestions
Add an explicit pointer near the Available Dimensions table, e.g. 'For full per-dimension checklists, see references/review-dimensions.md', so the reference is clearly signaled.
Consider moving the detailed Severity Criteria and Calibration Rules into the reference file (or a second reference) to keep SKILL.md a lean overview that points to depth one level deep.
Confirm the body references the existing bundle file by name so progressive disclosure can be verified against the actual bundle structure.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean and efficient: dimension tables, merge rules, severity criteria, and a copy-paste report template with no padding or explanation of concepts Claude already knows. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides concrete executable artifacts — a numbered deduplication process, a fill-in-the-blank consolidated report template, and severity calibration rules that can be applied directly. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Multi-step processes are clearly sequenced (the five-step Deduplication Process) with explicit decision branches and a severity escalation rule acting as a validation checkpoint. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is well-organized and references the real review-dimensions.md file, but the reference is not clearly signaled in the body (no explicit 'See review-dimensions.md for detailed checklists' link), and most dimension detail is inlined in SKILL.md rather than split out. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |