multi-reviewer-patterns

Coordinate parallel code reviews across multiple quality dimensions with finding deduplication, severity calibration, and consolidated reporting. Use this skill when organizing multi-reviewer code reviews, calibrating finding severity, or consolidating review results.

Quality

82%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

Securityby

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Quality

Content

72%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The content is highly actionable and well-structured, but two issues hold it back: the batch finding-merge workflow lacks validation checkpoints, and the existing review-dimensions reference file is never linked from the overview.

Suggestions

Add a verification checkpoint to the deduplication process (e.g., confirm all reviewer findings were processed and merged severities are consistent) to raise workflow clarity above the batch-operation cap.

Link references/review-dimensions.md from the 'Review Dimension Allocation' section (e.g., 'See review-dimensions.md for per-dimension checklists') so the bundle file is discoverable and the detailed checklists stay out of the main skill.

Tighten the consolidated report template — collapse the repeated per-severity sections into a single described structure — to trim tokens without losing usefulness.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Conciseness	Mostly efficient — well-structured tables, numbered rules, and a reusable report template with no padded explanations of concepts Claude already knows; the template and process pseudocode could be trimmed slightly, keeping it just below the lean anchor.	4 / 5
Actionability	Provides concrete dimension/severity tables with examples, explicit merge rules, a numbered deduplication process, and a copy-paste-ready consolidated report template covering the common cases.	5 / 5
Workflow Clarity	The deduplication process is sequenced, but this batch merge/consolidation operation has no validation or verification checkpoints, which caps workflow clarity at 3 per the batch-operation rule.	3 / 5
Progressive Disclosure	The body is well-sectioned, but a relevant bundle file (references/review-dimensions.md) exists and is never referenced or linked from the overview, so a detail file is present but not signaled.	3 / 5
	Total	15 / 20 Passed

Description

92%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is strong: it concisely states concrete capabilities, provides explicit 'Use this skill when…' trigger guidance with natural phrases, and occupies a distinct niche. The only minor gap is trigger-term synonym coverage.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Specificity	Names the domain and multiple concrete actions — 'finding deduplication, severity calibration, and consolidated reporting' — giving comprehensive coverage of the skill's scope, matching the anchor for multiple specific concrete actions.	5 / 5
Completeness	Explicitly states both what the skill does (first sentence) and when to use it ('Use this skill when organizing multi-reviewer code reviews, calibrating finding severity, or consolidating review results') with concrete trigger phrases.	5 / 5
Trigger Term Quality	Includes natural trigger phrases ('organizing multi-reviewer code reviews', 'calibrating finding severity', 'consolidating review results') but lacks common synonyms and variations a user might say, so it sits just below the comprehensive anchor.	4 / 5
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk	Targets a clear niche — multi-reviewer coordination, deduplication, severity calibration — with distinct triggers and minimal overlap risk with other skills.	5 / 5
	Total	19 / 20 Passed

Validation

93%

Warnings & errors only

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

Criteria	Description	Result
frontmatter_unknown_keys	Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata	Warning

	Total	15 / 16 Passed

Repository: wshobson/agents
Path: plugins/agent-teams/skills/multi-reviewer-patterns/SKILL.md
Commit: 38e19c2

Reviewed: 5 days ago

Table of Contents

Discovery Implementation Validation

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.