multi-reviewer-patterns
Coordinate parallel code reviews across multiple quality dimensions with finding deduplication, severity calibration, and consolidated reporting. Use this skill when organizing multi-reviewer code reviews, calibrating finding severity, or consolidating review results.
58
67%
Does it follow best practices?
Impact
—
No eval scenarios have been run
Passed
No known issues
Optimize this skill with Tessl
npx tessl skill review --optimize ./plugins/agent-teams/skills/multi-reviewer-patterns/SKILL.mdQuality
Discovery
85%Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.
This is a well-structured description that clearly communicates both what the skill does and when to use it, with a distinct niche around multi-reviewer code review coordination. The main weakness is that trigger terms could be broader to capture more natural user phrasings like 'PR review' or 'pull request feedback'. Overall it's a strong description that would perform well in skill selection.
Suggestions
Add common natural language variations users might use, such as 'PR review', 'pull request', 'review feedback', 'merge review comments', or 'combine reviewer feedback'.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Specificity | Lists multiple specific concrete actions: 'coordinate parallel code reviews', 'finding deduplication', 'severity calibration', and 'consolidated reporting'. These are distinct, concrete capabilities. | 3 / 3 |
Completeness | Clearly answers both what ('coordinate parallel code reviews across multiple quality dimensions with finding deduplication, severity calibration, and consolidated reporting') and when ('when organizing multi-reviewer code reviews, calibrating finding severity, or consolidating review results') with explicit trigger guidance. | 3 / 3 |
Trigger Term Quality | Includes relevant terms like 'code reviews', 'severity', 'multi-reviewer', and 'consolidated reporting', but misses common natural variations users might say such as 'PR review', 'pull request', 'review feedback', 'merge findings', or 'review summary'. | 2 / 3 |
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk | The focus on multi-reviewer coordination, deduplication, severity calibration, and consolidated reporting is a very specific niche that is unlikely to conflict with a general code review skill or other skills. The combination of these capabilities creates a distinct identity. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |
Implementation
50%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
This skill provides a solid reference framework for multi-reviewer code reviews with useful tables for dimension allocation, severity calibration, and a report template. However, it lacks an explicit end-to-end workflow with validation checkpoints, relies on pseudocode rather than executable steps, and could benefit from splitting detailed reference material (like the full report template) into separate files. The content is informative but reads more like a reference document than an actionable skill.
Suggestions
Add an explicit end-to-end workflow section (e.g., '1. Select dimensions → 2. Run parallel reviews → 3. Collect findings → 4. Deduplicate → 5. Calibrate severity → 6. Generate report → 7. Verify completeness') with validation checkpoints between steps.
Make the deduplication process more actionable—either provide executable code/script or concrete examples showing before/after deduplication with real findings.
Split the report template and severity calibration tables into separate referenced files (e.g., REPORT_TEMPLATE.md, SEVERITY_GUIDE.md) to improve progressive disclosure and keep the main skill lean.
Add a concrete worked example showing 2-3 reviewer outputs being merged into a final consolidated report to make the entire process tangible.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The content is reasonably well-structured with tables that convey information efficiently, but includes some unnecessary framing (e.g., 'When to Use This Skill' section lists things Claude can infer). The deduplication process pseudocode and severity calibration tables are useful but could be slightly tighter. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides structured guidance through tables, merge rules, and a report template, but the deduplication process is pseudocode rather than executable code. The skill is more of a process guide than executable instructions—the report template is copy-paste ready, but the actual review coordination steps lack concrete commands or tool usage. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The deduplication process has a clear sequence, and the dimension allocation tables guide decision-making. However, there's no overall end-to-end workflow showing how to orchestrate a full multi-reviewer review from start to finish, and no validation checkpoints (e.g., verifying deduplication completeness or confirming severity calibration before finalizing the report). | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The content is well-organized with clear sections and headers, but everything is in a single monolithic file. The report template and severity criteria tables could be split into referenced files. No bundle files are provided, so there's no progressive disclosure structure despite the content length warranting it. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 8 / 12 Passed |
Validation
90%Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.
Validation — 10 / 11 Passed
Validation for skill structure
| Criteria | Description | Result |
|---|---|---|
frontmatter_unknown_keys | Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata | Warning |
Total | 10 / 11 Passed | |
- Repository
- wshobson/agents
- Commit
34632bc
- Reviewed
Table of Contents
Is this your skill?
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.