Closing the intent-to-code chasm - specification-driven development with BDD verification chain
Overall
score
96%
Does it follow best practices?
Validation for skill structure
iikit-02-clarify
skills/iikit-02-clarify/SKILL.md
Activation
100%This is an excellent skill description that hits all the marks. It provides specific concrete actions, includes natural trigger terms users would actually say, explicitly answers both what and when, and carves out a distinct niche around specification ambiguity resolution with unique identifiers like requirement codes.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Specificity | Lists multiple specific concrete actions: 'identifies underspecified areas', 'asks targeted questions with option tables', and 'updates spec.md with answers linked to affected requirements (FR-XXX, SC-XXX)'. These are detailed, actionable capabilities. | 3 / 3 |
Completeness | Clearly answers both what (resolve ambiguities, identify underspecified areas, ask questions, update spec.md) AND when with explicit 'Use when...' clause listing five specific trigger scenarios. | 3 / 3 |
Trigger Term Quality | Includes natural keywords users would say: 'requirements are unclear', 'spec has gaps', 'details are missing', 'user stories need refinement', 'acceptance criteria'. These cover common variations of how users express specification ambiguity. | 3 / 3 |
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk | Clear niche focused on specification ambiguity resolution with distinct triggers like 'spec.md', 'FR-XXX, SC-XXX', 'option tables', and 'acceptance criteria'. Unlikely to conflict with general documentation or coding skills. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 12 / 12 Passed |
Implementation
100%This is a high-quality skill that demonstrates excellent structure and actionability. It provides concrete commands, clear workflows with validation checkpoints, and appropriate progressive disclosure through well-signaled references. The taxonomy for ambiguity scanning and the sequential questioning protocol are particularly well-specified.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The skill is lean and efficient, assuming Claude's competence throughout. No unnecessary explanations of concepts Claude already knows; every section serves a clear purpose with minimal padding. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides fully executable commands (bash/powershell scripts), specific taxonomies for scanning, concrete output formats, and exact integration steps. The question format constraints and validation rules are copy-paste ready. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear 6-step sequence with explicit validation after each write and final pass. Includes feedback loops (re-run prerequisites after selection), save-after-each-integration checkpoints, and early termination handling. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-structured overview with clear one-level-deep references to supporting files (constitution-loading.md, conversation-guide.md, clarification-format.md, model-recommendations.md). Content appropriately split between main skill and reference documents. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 12 / 12 Passed |
Validation
100%Validation — 11 / 11 Passed
Validation for skill structure
No warnings or errors.