Closing the intent-to-code chasm - specification-driven development with BDD verification chain
Overall
score
96%
Does it follow best practices?
Validation for skill structure
iikit-04-checklist
skills/iikit-04-checklist/SKILL.md
Activation
100%This is a strong skill description that excels across all dimensions. It clearly specifies what the skill does (generate quality checklists for requirements validation), provides concrete output details (scored items linked to spec sections), and includes an explicit 'Use when...' clause with multiple natural trigger terms. The description is distinctive enough to avoid conflicts with related skills.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Specificity | Lists multiple specific concrete actions: 'validate requirements completeness, clarity, and consistency', 'produces scored checklist items linked to specific spec sections (FR-XXX, SC-XXX)'. Clear output format is specified. | 3 / 3 |
Completeness | Clearly answers both what ('Generate quality checklists that validate requirements completeness, clarity, and consistency') AND when ('Use when reviewing a spec for gaps, doing a requirements review, verifying PRD quality, auditing user stories and acceptance criteria, or gating before implementation'). | 3 / 3 |
Trigger Term Quality | Excellent coverage of natural terms users would say: 'spec', 'gaps', 'requirements review', 'PRD quality', 'user stories', 'acceptance criteria', 'gating before implementation'. These are terms practitioners naturally use. | 3 / 3 |
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk | Clear niche focused on requirements/spec validation with distinct triggers like 'FR-XXX, SC-XXX', 'PRD quality', 'requirements review'. Unlikely to conflict with general documentation or code review skills. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 12 / 12 Passed |
Implementation
85%This is a well-structured skill with excellent actionability and workflow clarity. The multi-step process includes proper validation checkpoints and feedback loops for gap resolution. Minor verbosity in the Windows command repetition and conditional next steps section prevents a perfect conciseness score, but overall the skill is effective and well-organized.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The skill is reasonably efficient but includes some redundancy (Windows commands repeated inline, verbose next steps section with conditional logic). The core workflow is clear but could be tightened. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides fully executable bash/powershell commands, specific file paths, concrete item structure examples with correct/wrong patterns, and clear output requirements. Copy-paste ready commands throughout. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear 6-step sequence with explicit validation checkpoints (prerequisites check, gap resolution loop, remaining item validation). Includes feedback loops for gap resolution and explicit completion criteria (100% before success). | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-structured overview with clear one-level-deep references to supporting files (constitution-loading.md, conversation-guide.md, checklist-examples.md, checklist-template.md, model-recommendations.md). Content appropriately split between main skill and reference materials. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |
Validation
100%Validation — 11 / 11 Passed
Validation for skill structure
No warnings or errors.