Closing the intent-to-code chasm - specification-driven development with BDD verification chain
Overall
score
96%
Does it follow best practices?
Validation for skill structure
iikit-06-tasks
skills/iikit-06-tasks/SKILL.md
Activation
100%This is a well-crafted skill description that follows best practices. It uses third person voice, provides specific concrete actions, includes a clear 'Use when...' clause with natural trigger terms, and carves out a distinct niche around dependency-aware task breakdown for development planning.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Specificity | Lists multiple specific concrete actions: 'Generate dependency-ordered task breakdown', 'breaking features into implementable tasks', 'planning sprints', 'creating work items with parallel markers'. These are concrete, actionable capabilities. | 3 / 3 |
Completeness | Clearly answers both what ('Generate dependency-ordered task breakdown from plan and specification') and when ('Use when breaking features into implementable tasks, planning sprints, or creating work items with parallel markers') with explicit trigger guidance. | 3 / 3 |
Trigger Term Quality | Includes natural keywords users would say: 'task breakdown', 'features', 'tasks', 'planning sprints', 'work items', 'parallel markers'. These cover common project management and development planning terminology. | 3 / 3 |
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk | Clear niche focused on dependency-ordered task generation from plans/specs. The specific mention of 'dependency-ordered', 'parallel markers', and 'sprints' distinguishes it from generic planning or documentation skills. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 12 / 12 Passed |
Implementation
85%This is a well-structured skill with excellent workflow clarity and actionability. The multi-phase execution flow is clearly sequenced with validation checkpoints, and concrete examples demonstrate both correct and incorrect formats. Minor verbosity in dual OS command listings and format examples slightly impacts token efficiency.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The skill is moderately efficient but includes some redundancy (e.g., repeating Windows commands alongside bash, verbose examples of wrong formats). Some sections could be tightened, though it avoids explaining concepts Claude already knows. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides fully executable commands with exact paths, concrete task format examples with correct/incorrect patterns, and specific script invocations. The guidance is copy-paste ready with clear file paths and command structures. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Excellent multi-step workflow with clear sequencing (Prerequisites → Validation → Execution phases 1-8 → Report → Dashboard). Includes explicit validation checkpoints (dependency graph validation, circular dependency detection, checklist gates) and error recovery paths. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-structured with clear references to external files (constitution-loading.md, conversation-guide.md, formatting-guide.md, tasks-template.md, model-recommendations.md). References are one level deep and clearly signaled with descriptive context for each link. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |
Validation
100%Validation — 11 / 11 Passed
Validation for skill structure
No warnings or errors.