CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

tessl-labs/intent-integrity-kit

Closing the intent-to-code chasm - specification-driven development with BDD verification chain

Overall
score

96%

Does it follow best practices?

Validation for skill structure

Overview
Skills
Evals
Files

iikit-06-tasks

skills/iikit-06-tasks/SKILL.md

Activation

100%

This is a well-crafted skill description that follows best practices. It uses third person voice, provides specific concrete actions, includes a clear 'Use when...' clause with natural trigger terms, and carves out a distinct niche around dependency-aware task breakdown for development planning.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Lists multiple specific concrete actions: 'Generate dependency-ordered task breakdown', 'breaking features into implementable tasks', 'planning sprints', 'creating work items with parallel markers'. These are concrete, actionable capabilities.

3 / 3

Completeness

Clearly answers both what ('Generate dependency-ordered task breakdown from plan and specification') and when ('Use when breaking features into implementable tasks, planning sprints, or creating work items with parallel markers') with explicit trigger guidance.

3 / 3

Trigger Term Quality

Includes natural keywords users would say: 'task breakdown', 'features', 'tasks', 'planning sprints', 'work items', 'parallel markers'. These cover common project management and development planning terminology.

3 / 3

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Clear niche focused on dependency-ordered task generation from plans/specs. The specific mention of 'dependency-ordered', 'parallel markers', and 'sprints' distinguishes it from generic planning or documentation skills.

3 / 3

Total

12

/

12

Passed

Implementation

85%

This is a well-structured skill with excellent workflow clarity and actionability. The multi-phase execution flow is clearly sequenced with validation checkpoints, and concrete examples demonstrate both correct and incorrect formats. Minor verbosity in dual OS command listings and format examples slightly impacts token efficiency.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The skill is moderately efficient but includes some redundancy (e.g., repeating Windows commands alongside bash, verbose examples of wrong formats). Some sections could be tightened, though it avoids explaining concepts Claude already knows.

2 / 3

Actionability

Provides fully executable commands with exact paths, concrete task format examples with correct/incorrect patterns, and specific script invocations. The guidance is copy-paste ready with clear file paths and command structures.

3 / 3

Workflow Clarity

Excellent multi-step workflow with clear sequencing (Prerequisites → Validation → Execution phases 1-8 → Report → Dashboard). Includes explicit validation checkpoints (dependency graph validation, circular dependency detection, checklist gates) and error recovery paths.

3 / 3

Progressive Disclosure

Well-structured with clear references to external files (constitution-loading.md, conversation-guide.md, formatting-guide.md, tasks-template.md, model-recommendations.md). References are one level deep and clearly signaled with descriptive context for each link.

3 / 3

Total

11

/

12

Passed

Validation

100%

Validation11 / 11 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.