Async/sync FHIR client for Python providing comprehensive API for CRUD operations over FHIR resources
Agent Success
Agent success rate when using this tile
68%
Improvement
Agent success rate improvement when using this tile compared to baseline
1.08x
Baseline
Agent success rate without this tile
63%
{
"context": "Evaluates how well the solution leverages fhirpy result-fetching helpers to retrieve, paginate, and count FHIR resources for the tasks in question_3.md. Emphasizes using built-in helpers instead of manual HTTP handling, especially for single-result, paginated, raw bundle, and counting flows.",
"type": "weighted_checklist",
"checklist": [
{
"name": "Direct get",
"description": "Uses fhirpy's `.get()` on a resource search set or client to retrieve a single resource by type/id, relying on built-in `ResourceNotFound`/`MultipleResourcesFound` handling instead of manual filtering or generic requests.",
"max_score": 20
},
{
"name": "First helper",
"description": "Obtains the first active Patient via the search set `.first()` helper (or equivalent fetch with `limit=1`) rather than fetching all and slicing locally.",
"max_score": 20
},
{
"name": "Paged appointments",
"description": "Collects Appointment resources for the patient across pages using `.fetch_all()` or iteration over the search set (not a single page or custom paging) and orders via `.sort()`/`_sort` on start/date before extracting ids.",
"max_score": 25
},
{
"name": "Server count",
"description": "Retrieves the total Appointment match count using the search set `.count()` call instead of deriving totals from collected results.",
"max_score": 15
},
{
"name": "Raw encounters",
"description": "Fetches Encounter results with related Practitioner includes via `.fetch_raw()` (or `fetch_raw` on the search set) so the raw bundle with included entries is returned without stripping or re-serializing resources.",
"max_score": 20
}
]
}evals
scenario-1
scenario-2
scenario-3
scenario-4
scenario-5
scenario-6
scenario-7
scenario-8
scenario-9
scenario-10