tessl install github:brianlovin/claude-config --skill sentrySentry error monitoring and performance tracing patterns for Next.js applications.
Review Score
69%
Validation Score
12/16
Implementation Score
80%
Activation Score
40%
Generated
Validation
Total
12/16Score
Passed| Criteria | Score |
|---|---|
description_trigger_hint | Description may be missing an explicit 'when to use' trigger hint (e.g., 'Use when...') |
metadata_version | 'metadata' field is not a dictionary |
license_field | 'license' field is missing |
body_steps | No step-by-step structure detected (no ordered list); consider adding a simple workflow |
Implementation
Suggestions 2
Score
80%Overall Assessment
This is a solid, actionable skill with excellent code examples that are immediately usable. The content is appropriately concise and assumes Claude's competence. However, it could benefit from clearer setup workflow sequencing and verification steps to confirm Sentry is properly configured and capturing events.
Suggestions
| Dimension | Score | Reasoning |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | 3/3 | The content is lean and efficient, providing only essential information without explaining what Sentry is or how error monitoring works. Every section delivers actionable code without unnecessary preamble. |
Actionability | 3/3 | All examples are fully executable JavaScript/TypeScript code that can be copy-pasted directly. The code covers exception catching, performance tracing, configuration, and logging with complete, working examples. |
Workflow Clarity | 2/3 | The content presents clear patterns but lacks workflow sequencing. For a setup-oriented skill, it doesn't specify the order of operations (e.g., configure first, then use) or validation steps to verify Sentry is working correctly. |
Progressive Disclosure | 2/3 | Content is well-organized with clear sections, but everything is inline in one file. The configuration section could reference separate files for advanced options, and there's no mention of where to find more detailed Sentry documentation or project-specific configurations. |
Activation
Suggestions 3
Score
40%Overall Assessment
The description identifies a clear technical niche (Sentry with Next.js) which provides good distinctiveness, but lacks explicit trigger guidance and specific actionable capabilities. It reads more like a topic label than a skill description that helps Claude decide when to use it.
Suggestions
| Dimension | Score | Reasoning |
|---|---|---|
Specificity | 2/3 | Names the domain (Sentry, Next.js) and general actions (error monitoring, performance tracing), but doesn't list specific concrete actions like 'configure alerts', 'set up source maps', or 'create custom spans'. |
Completeness | 1/3 | Describes what the skill covers but completely lacks a 'Use when...' clause or any explicit trigger guidance for when Claude should select this skill. |
Trigger Term Quality | 2/3 | Includes relevant keywords like 'Sentry', 'error monitoring', 'performance tracing', and 'Next.js', but misses common variations users might say like 'debugging', 'exceptions', 'APM', 'observability', or 'crash reporting'. |
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk | 3/3 | The combination of 'Sentry' + 'Next.js' creates a clear, specific niche that is unlikely to conflict with other skills; these are distinct product/framework names. |