Assess your AI fluency using Anthropic's 4D framework (Dakan, Feller & Anthropic, 2025). Scans Claude Code sessions, runs LLM-based behavior classification on all messages, asks a self-assessment questionnaire for 6 unobservable behaviors, and generates a visual HTML report with scores and actionable feedback. Use when "assess fluency", "AI fluency", "fluency report", "fluency assessment", "4D framework", or "how AI fluent am I".
75
94%
Does it follow best practices?
Impact
—
No eval scenarios have been run
Passed
No known issues
Quality
Discovery
100%Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.
This is an excellent skill description that clearly articulates specific capabilities (scanning sessions, behavior classification, self-assessment questionnaire, HTML report generation), provides a well-defined domain (AI fluency assessment using the 4D framework), and includes explicit trigger terms in a 'Use when' clause. The description is concise yet comprehensive, uses proper third-person voice, and occupies a highly distinctive niche that minimizes conflict risk with other skills.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Specificity | Lists multiple specific concrete actions: scans Claude Code sessions, runs LLM-based behavior classification on all messages, asks a self-assessment questionnaire for 6 unobservable behaviors, and generates a visual HTML report with scores and actionable feedback. | 3 / 3 |
Completeness | Clearly answers both 'what does this do' (assess AI fluency using the 4D framework, scan sessions, classify behaviors, run questionnaire, generate HTML report) AND 'when should Claude use it' with an explicit 'Use when...' clause listing trigger phrases. | 3 / 3 |
Trigger Term Quality | Includes a strong set of natural trigger terms users would say: 'assess fluency', 'AI fluency', 'fluency report', 'fluency assessment', '4D framework', and 'how AI fluent am I'. These cover both formal and conversational phrasings. | 3 / 3 |
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk | Highly distinctive with a clear niche: AI fluency assessment using a specific named framework (Anthropic's 4D framework by Dakan, Feller & Anthropic, 2025). Very unlikely to conflict with other skills due to the unique domain and specific trigger terms. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 12 / 12 Passed |
Implementation
85%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
This is a well-structured, highly actionable skill that clearly sequences a complex multi-step assessment workflow with concrete commands and code at each stage. Progressive disclosure is well-handled with references to framework and report spec files. Minor verbosity in explanatory sections (scoring criteria, framework description) could be tightened, but overall the content is effective and well-organized.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Generally efficient but includes some unnecessary explanation (e.g., explaining what the 4D framework is, noting that subagent files have no user messages). The scoring criteria section is somewhat verbose with definitions Claude could infer. However, most content earns its place. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides fully executable bash commands with clear flag options, concrete Python code for saving questionnaire responses, specific file paths for outputs, and exact questions to ask. The workflow is copy-paste ready throughout. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear 5-step sequence with explicit outputs at each stage (evidence.json, analysis.json, questionnaire saved, HTML report generated, report opened). The workflow handles the LLM vs regex-only fallback path and includes concrete scoring criteria for the judgment step. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | SKILL.md serves as a clear overview with well-signaled one-level-deep references to FRAMEWORK.md and REPORT-SPEC.md for detailed specifications. The main file contains the actionable workflow while appropriately deferring the full 24-behavior table and HTML design spec to reference files. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |
Validation
100%Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.
Validation — 11 / 11 Passed
Validation for skill structure
No warnings or errors.
Reviewed
Table of Contents