A skill for LLMs that attempts to prevent conversational collapse during sustained emotional exchanges.
94
94%
Does it follow best practices?
Impact
Pending
No eval scenarios have been run
Passed
No known issues
Quality
Discovery
100%Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.
This is an excellent skill description that clearly articulates specific capabilities (emotion validation, tone maintenance, avoiding premature reassurance), provides explicit trigger conditions with natural emotional keywords, and carves out a distinct niche by addressing LLM-specific failure modes in prolonged emotional exchanges. The description also helpfully scopes what it is NOT, reducing conflict risk. It uses proper third-person voice throughout.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Specificity | Lists multiple specific concrete actions: 'Validates emotions, maintains empathetic tone, avoids premature reassurance, and prevents repetitive or hollow responses.' Also names specific failure modes it addresses: 'strategy preference collapse, premature escalation, grief-flattening.' | 3 / 3 |
Completeness | Clearly answers both 'what' (validates emotions, maintains empathetic tone, avoids premature reassurance, prevents repetitive responses, addresses LLM failure modes) and 'when' with an explicit 'Use when...' clause specifying grief, pain, fear, hopelessness, anger, multiple turns, and prolonged emotional territory. | 3 / 3 |
Trigger Term Quality | Includes strong natural trigger terms users/Claude would encounter: 'grief, pain, fear, hopelessness, anger, intense emotions, prolonged emotional territory, extended emotional exchanges.' These are terms that naturally arise in the relevant context. | 3 / 3 |
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk | Highly distinctive niche — focuses specifically on extended emotional exchanges and LLM-specific behavioral failure modes in empathetic conversation. The explicit scoping ('not clinical intervention, not a substitute for professional mental health support') and the focus on multi-turn emotional conversations makes it clearly distinguishable from general conversation or mental health skills. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 12 / 12 Passed |
Implementation
85%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
This is a strong, well-crafted skill that addresses a real and specific LLM failure mode with concrete, actionable guidance. The tiered context system, anti-pattern table, and calibration checks provide clear structure without over-explaining. Minor verbosity in the framing sections is the only notable weakness — the principles section could be slightly tighter without losing meaning.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The skill is mostly efficient and avoids explaining things Claude already knows (like what grief is), but some principles are slightly verbose — e.g., Principle 1's explanation could be tighter. The anti-pattern table is admirably concise. Some sections like 'The Problem' include background context that borders on unnecessary but is arguably needed to frame the failure mode. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Highly actionable throughout. Each tier has concrete do/don't lists with specific behavioral instructions. The anti-pattern table provides signal-fix pairs. The calibration checks are concrete self-diagnostic questions with specific thresholds (e.g., 'same structure 3+ times'). This is instruction-only skill territory where code isn't expected, and the guidance is specific and directly executable. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The skill clearly sequences behavior through context tiers (0→1→2) with explicit upgrade paths between them. The calibration checks serve as validation checkpoints during sustained conversations. The anti-pattern table functions as an error-detection and recovery mechanism. For a conversational behavior skill, this is exceptionally well-structured with clear feedback loops. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Excellent progressive disclosure. The main file provides a clear overview with the anti-pattern quick-reference table, while pointing to one-level-deep references for full details: escalation-ladder.md, research-support.md, and anti-patterns.md. References are well-signaled and contextually placed where they're needed, not dumped at the end. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |
Validation
100%Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.
Validation — 11 / 11 Passed
Validation for skill structure
No warnings or errors.
Reviewed
Table of Contents