CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

coralogix/opentelemetry-skills

OpenTelemetry Collector deployment, instrumentation (Java/Python/Node.js/.NET/Go), and OTTL pipeline transforms for Coralogix — coralogix exporter config, Helm chart selection, Kubernetes topology, ECS/EKS/GKE deployments, SDK setup, APM transactions, and OTTL cardinality/PII/routing.

98

1.13x
Quality

97%

Does it follow best practices?

Impact

99%

1.13x

Average score across 81 eval scenarios

SecuritybySnyk

Advisory

Suggest reviewing before use

Overview
Quality
Evals
Security
Files

criteria.jsonevals/scenario-75/

{
  "context": "Evaluating a Coralogix support response for this user question:\n\nOur fleet has a mix of old and new OpenTelemetry instrumentation libraries. Some spans come in with http.method and http.status_code (v1 semconv), others with http.request.method and http.response.status_code (v2). Our dashboards expect v2 attribute names. How do I write OTTL that normalizes the old v1 names to v2 without overwriting spans that already have v2?",
  "type": "weighted_checklist",
  "checklist": [
    {
      "name": "mentions-http-request-method",
      "description": "The response contains \"http.request.method\" (case-sensitive).",
      "max_score": 3
    },
    {
      "name": "mentions-set",
      "description": "The response contains \"set(\" (case-sensitive).",
      "max_score": 3
    },
    {
      "name": "no-copies-v1-into-v2-unconditionally-or-that",
      "description": "Guards each set() with a where clause that checks the v2 destination is nil — e.g. where attributes[\"http.request.method\"] == nil — so spans that already have v2 attributes are not overwritten. A response that copies v1 into v2 unconditionally, or that only guards on the v1 source being present without also checking the v2 destination is empty, is a FAIL.",
      "max_score": 2
    }
  ]
}

evals

README.md

tile.json