CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

crocoder-dev/opencode-sce-context-sync

Sync Shared Context Engineering context files with implemented code changes.

97

Quality

97%

Does it follow best practices?

Impact

Pending

No eval scenarios have been run

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No known issues

Overview
Quality
Evals
Security
Files

Quality

Discovery

100%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

This is a well-crafted skill description that excels across all dimensions. It opens with explicit 'Use when' triggers using natural language, provides specific concrete actions, and clearly defines its niche around AI context/memory file maintenance. The description effectively distinguishes itself from general documentation tools by focusing on the specific `context/` directory structure and AI memory alignment.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Lists multiple specific concrete actions: 'Scans modified code, classifies the change significance, then updates or verifies Markdown context files' with explicit file types (overview, architecture, glossary, patterns, context-map, domain files) under a specific path (`context/`).

3 / 3

Completeness

Explicitly answers both what ('Scans modified code, classifies change significance, updates/verifies Markdown context files') AND when ('Use when user wants to update project documentation to reflect code changes, sync docs with code, refresh project context, or keep AI memory files accurate').

3 / 3

Trigger Term Quality

Includes natural keywords users would say: 'update project documentation', 'sync docs with code', 'refresh project context', 'AI memory files', 'implementation task'. Good coverage of variations for documentation synchronization tasks.

3 / 3

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Clear niche focusing specifically on AI memory/context file synchronization under `context/` directory. The specific file types and 'durable AI memory' terminology distinguish it from general documentation skills.

3 / 3

Total

12

/

12

Passed

Implementation

92%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

This is a high-quality skill with excellent actionability and workflow clarity. The step-by-step process is well-defined with clear decision gates, concrete examples, and validation checkpoints. The content is appropriately concise while being comprehensive, though the progressive disclosure could be slightly improved by extracting reference tables to separate files for very large context scenarios.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The content is lean and efficient, avoiding explanations of concepts Claude already knows. Every section serves a clear purpose with no padding or unnecessary context about what documentation is or why it matters.

3 / 3

Actionability

Provides concrete, specific guidance with a clear step-by-step workflow, classification table, domain file policy, and a before/after example showing exact file contents and structure. The example is copy-paste ready.

3 / 3

Workflow Clarity

The 9-step sync pass workflow is clearly sequenced with explicit decision points (classify → verify → edit or skip → create domain files → update context-map → final check). Includes validation checkpoints like 'confirm they match code truth' and 'Final check' step.

3 / 3

Progressive Disclosure

Content is well-organized with clear sections and internal anchor links (Classification Reference, Domain File Policy), but all content is inline in a single file. For a skill of this complexity (~100 lines), splitting the classification reference or domain file policy into separate files could improve navigation.

2 / 3

Total

11

/

12

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation11 / 11 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Reviewed

Table of Contents