This is a strong skill description that excels across all dimensions. It clearly specifies concrete actions (creating structured plans with atomic tasks), provides excellent trigger term coverage with natural language users would actually say, includes an explicit 'Use when' clause with multiple scenarios, and carves out a distinct niche that won't conflict with other skills.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Specificity	Lists multiple concrete actions: 'Creates or updates structured SCE implementation plans', 'Breaks a change request into scoped, atomic tasks', and specifies outputs include 'clear goals, boundaries, acceptance criteria, and verification steps'. Also specifies the exact output location.	3 / 3
Completeness	Clearly answers both what (creates/updates implementation plans with atomic tasks, goals, criteria) AND when with explicit 'Use when' clause covering three distinct trigger scenarios: planning features/refactors, needing task breakdowns, or describing changes requiring structured planning.	3 / 3
Trigger Term Quality	Includes natural keywords users would say: 'plan a new feature', 'refactor', 'integration', 'project plan', 'task breakdown', 'implementation roadmap', 'work plan', 'structured planning'. Good coverage of variations users might naturally use.	3 / 3
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk	Highly distinctive with specific niche: SCE implementation plans in a specific directory path, atomic task breakdown with acceptance criteria. The combination of structured planning output format and specific use cases makes it unlikely to conflict with generic coding or documentation skills.	3 / 3
	Total	12 / 12 Passed

Implementation

100%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

This is an excellent skill that demonstrates strong planning methodology with clear blocking gates, atomic task requirements, and concrete examples. The workflow is well-sequenced with explicit validation checkpoints, and the content efficiently communicates requirements without unnecessary verbosity. The skill appropriately references an external example file for detailed walkthrough while keeping the core instructions concise.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Conciseness	The skill is lean and efficient, with no unnecessary explanations of concepts Claude already knows. Every section serves a clear purpose and the content assumes Claude's competence in understanding planning concepts.	3 / 3
Actionability	Provides concrete, executable guidance with specific task format requirements, example clarification questions, a filled-in task example, and exact output commands like `/next-task {plan_name} T01`. The checkbox syntax and verification commands are copy-paste ready.	3 / 3
Workflow Clarity	Clear multi-step workflow with explicit blocking gates (clarification gate), validation checkpoints (ambiguity check before writing), and a required final validation task. The sequence from intake trigger through output contract is unambiguous with explicit feedback loops.	3 / 3
Progressive Disclosure	Well-structured with clear sections and appropriate reference to external file (`context/plans/PLAN_EXAMPLE.md`) for the full annotated example. Content is appropriately split between inline essentials and external reference material.	3 / 3
	Total	12 / 12 Passed

Validation

100%

Warnings & errors only

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 11 / 11 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Reviewed

22 days ago

Table of Contents

Discovery Implementation Validation