This is an excellent skill description that clearly articulates specific actions (test suite execution, lint/format checks, scaffolding removal, structured report writing), provides a concrete output location, and includes a comprehensive 'Use when...' clause with multiple natural trigger phrases. It is highly distinctive and unlikely to conflict with other skills due to its specific focus on the final validation phase of a project plan.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Specificity	Lists multiple specific concrete actions: executing the full test suite, lint and format checks, removing temporary scaffolding, and writing a structured validation report with command outputs and success-criteria evidence to a specific file path.	3 / 3
Completeness	Clearly answers both 'what' (runs test suite, lint/format checks, removes scaffolding, writes validation report) and 'when' with an explicit 'Use when...' clause listing five distinct trigger scenarios.	3 / 3
Trigger Term Quality	Includes strong natural trigger terms users would say: 'verify a completed implementation', 'confirm all success criteria are met', 'wrap up a plan', 'finalize a feature or fix', 'sign off on a change', 'closing it out'. These cover multiple natural phrasings.	3 / 3
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk	Highly distinctive — it targets a specific phase (final validation of a project plan), references a specific output path (`context/plans/{plan_name}.md`), and combines testing, linting, scaffolding removal, and report writing in a way that is unlikely to overlap with general testing or linting skills.	3 / 3
	Total	12 / 12 Passed

Implementation

92%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

This is a strong, well-structured skill that provides clear, actionable guidance for plan validation. The workflow is well-sequenced with explicit feedback loops for failure recovery, and the example report entry gives Claude a concrete output template. The only minor weakness is that all content is inline, though the skill's moderate length makes this acceptable.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Conciseness	Every section earns its place. No unnecessary explanations of what tests or linting are. The examples of tool names (pytest, eslint, ruff) serve as concrete discovery hints rather than padding. The content is lean and assumes Claude knows how to work with these tools.	3 / 3
Actionability	The checklist provides concrete steps with specific tool names, specific config files to check for discovery, specific auto-fix flags (e.g., `ruff --fix`, `eslint --fix`), and a concrete example report with exact output format. The guidance is specific enough to be directly executable.	3 / 3
Workflow Clarity	The 5-step checklist is clearly sequenced, and the 'If checks fail' section provides explicit feedback loops: fix → re-run → update report. There's a clear escalation path for non-trivial failures. The validation report structure serves as a final checkpoint ensuring all criteria are verified.	3 / 3
Progressive Disclosure	The content is well-structured with clear sections (checklist, failure handling, report format, example), but everything is inline in a single file. For this skill's complexity level (~60 lines), this is borderline acceptable, but the report template and example could potentially be split out. The organization is good but not exemplary.	2 / 3
	Total	11 / 12 Passed

Validation

100%

Warnings & errors only

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 11 / 11 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Reviewed

5 days ago

Table of Contents

Discovery Implementation Validation