This is a strong skill description that clearly articulates both what the skill does and when to use it. It opens with an explicit 'Use when' clause containing multiple natural trigger phrases, then describes specific concrete actions and the exact files it operates on. The description is distinctive enough to avoid conflicts with general documentation or code-related skills.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Specificity	Lists multiple specific concrete actions: scans modified code, classifies change significance, updates/verifies Markdown context files. Also names specific file types: overview, architecture, glossary, patterns, context-map, and domain files under `context/`.	3 / 3
Completeness	Clearly answers both 'what' (scans modified code, classifies change significance, updates Markdown context files) and 'when' (explicit 'Use when' clause covering updating docs after code changes, syncing docs, refreshing context, keeping memory files accurate).	3 / 3
Trigger Term Quality	Includes strong natural trigger terms users would say: 'update project documentation', 'sync docs with code', 'refresh project context', 'keep AI memory files accurate', 'implementation task'. These cover multiple natural phrasings a user might employ.	3 / 3
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk	Highly distinctive with a clear niche: updating AI memory/context Markdown files under `context/` to reflect code changes. The specific mention of durable AI memory, context files, and the `context/` directory makes it unlikely to conflict with general documentation or code skills.	3 / 3
	Total	12 / 12 Passed

Implementation

77%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

This is a well-structured skill with strong actionability and workflow clarity. The step-by-step sync pass, classification table with concrete examples, and before/after example make it highly usable. Minor improvements could be made in conciseness (some repetition across sections) and progressive disclosure (could benefit from splitting reference material into linked files).

Suggestions

Reduce repetition of 'verify root files' instructions that appear in both the gating section and the workflow steps—consolidate into the workflow alone.

Consider extracting the Classification Reference table and Domain File Creation Policy into separate linked reference files to improve progressive disclosure.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Conciseness	The skill is mostly efficient and avoids explaining concepts Claude already knows, but some sections are slightly verbose—e.g., the principle section and some repeated phrasing about 'verify root files' across multiple sections. The classification table and domain file policy could be tightened slightly.	2 / 3
Actionability	The skill provides a concrete step-by-step workflow, specific file paths to check, a clear classification table with real examples, a before/after example showing exactly what to create, and explicit quality constraints. This is highly actionable guidance.	3 / 3
Workflow Clarity	The 9-step workflow is clearly sequenced with a classification gate at step 1, explicit verify-then-edit logic, and a final check step that serves as validation (250-line limit, diagrams, relative paths). The feedback loop of classify → verify → edit/skip → final check is well-structured.	3 / 3
Progressive Disclosure	The skill uses internal anchor links (e.g., [Classification Reference], [Domain File Policy]) for navigation within the document, which is good. However, all content is inline in a single file that's moderately long; the classification reference and domain file policy could potentially be split out. For a skill of this complexity, the organization is adequate but not ideal.	2 / 3
	Total	10 / 12 Passed

Validation

100%

Warnings & errors only

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 11 / 11 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Reviewed

4 days ago

Table of Contents

Discovery Implementation Validation