Repair stale Shared Context Engineering context files to match code truth.
100
100%
Does it follow best practices?
Impact
Pending
No eval scenarios have been run
Passed
No known issues
Quality
Discovery
100%Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.
This is an excellent skill description that follows best practices. It leads with explicit 'Use when...' guidance including natural trigger phrases, clearly specifies the target domain (context/ directory), and lists concrete actions. The description establishes code as source of truth, making the skill's behavior predictable and distinct.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Specificity | Lists multiple specific concrete actions: 'Audits files in `context/`', 'identifies discrepancies between documentation and implemented code', 'updates context files to remove outdated references, correct stale descriptions, and sync documentation with recent code changes'. | 3 / 3 |
Completeness | Explicitly answers both what (audits context files, identifies discrepancies, updates documentation) AND when (starts with 'Use when...' clause with specific trigger scenarios and example phrases). | 3 / 3 |
Trigger Term Quality | Excellent coverage of natural user phrases: 'update docs', 'sync context files', 'fix outdated documentation', 'refresh context', 'context is out of date' - these are exactly what users would naturally say. | 3 / 3 |
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk | Clear niche focused specifically on context documentation in `context/` directory, with distinct triggers around 'stale', 'outdated', 'sync' documentation - unlikely to conflict with general documentation or code editing skills. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 12 / 12 Passed |
Implementation
100%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
This is a well-crafted skill that efficiently communicates a clear workflow for fixing stale context documentation. It provides concrete examples, explicit decision points, and appropriate validation steps. The content respects Claude's intelligence while giving precise, actionable guidance.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The content is lean and efficient, with no unnecessary explanations of concepts Claude already knows. Every section serves a clear purpose and the example is minimal but illustrative. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides concrete, specific guidance with clear decision trees (if report exists vs. not), explicit file paths, and a before/after example showing exactly what edits look like. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear sequential workflow with explicit checkpoints: check for context/, search for reports, handle missing reports, ask for confirmation, prompt on ambiguity. Includes verification summary as final validation step. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized with clear sections (What I do, How to run this, Example, Expected output). References external skill (`sce-drift-analyzer`) and files appropriately without deep nesting. Content is appropriately sized for a single file. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 12 / 12 Passed |
Validation
100%Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.
Validation — 11 / 11 Passed
Validation for skill structure
No warnings or errors.
Reviewed
Table of Contents