Create structured handover notes for Shared Context Engineering tasks.
94
94%
Does it follow best practices?
Impact
Pending
No eval scenarios have been run
Passed
No known issues
Quality
Discovery
100%Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.
This is an excellent skill description that clearly articulates what the skill does (creates structured handover documents with specific content elements), where outputs are saved, and when to use it (with both general use cases and specific trigger phrases). It follows best practices by using third person voice, providing concrete actions, and including natural language trigger terms that users would actually say.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Specificity | Lists multiple specific concrete actions: 'Creates a structured handover document summarizing task context, decisions made, open questions, and recommended next steps' and specifies the save location 'context/handovers/'. These are detailed, concrete capabilities. | 3 / 3 |
Completeness | Clearly answers both 'what' (creates structured handover document with context, decisions, open questions, next steps) and 'when' (explicit 'Use when...' clause with multiple trigger scenarios and example phrases). | 3 / 3 |
Trigger Term Quality | Excellent coverage of natural trigger terms users would say: 'hand off', 'transition', 'pass a task', 'handover notes', 'task transition document', 'capture current progress', plus explicit trigger phrases like 'create a handover', 'hand this off', 'write handover notes', 'pass this task on', 'document where I'm up to'. | 3 / 3 |
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk | Very clear niche focused specifically on handover/transition documents with a distinct output location and purpose. Unlikely to conflict with general documentation or note-taking skills due to the specific handover/transition framing and trigger terms. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 12 / 12 Passed |
Implementation
85%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
This is a well-structured, concise skill that clearly defines what to produce, how to produce it, and what the output looks like. The template with inline examples is the right approach for a document-generation skill. The only minor weakness is that actionability could be slightly improved with a concrete file-creation command or code snippet.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The content is lean and efficient. Every section serves a purpose — no explanation of what a handover is or why it matters. The template examples are brief and illustrative without being padded. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | The guidance is concrete with a clear template and examples for each section, but it's instruction-oriented rather than executable code. The naming convention `{plan_name}-{task_id}` is specific, but there's no concrete command or code snippet showing file creation, which slightly reduces actionability. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The four steps are clearly sequenced with an explicit verification checkpoint (step 4: confirm all sections populated). The fallback instruction for missing details (infer and label assumptions) provides a clear decision path. For a document-creation skill, this is appropriately thorough. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | For a skill under 50 lines with a single purpose, the content is well-organized into logical sections (what/how/template/output) without needing external references. The template is appropriately inline since it's the core deliverable. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |
Validation
100%Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.
Validation — 11 / 11 Passed
Validation for skill structure
No warnings or errors.
Reviewed
Table of Contents