{
  "context": "Tests whether the agent challenges a technology choice by asking why that specific technology over a named alternative, and probing a realistic 2-year future scenario — rather than accepting the choice uncritically.",
  "type": "weighted_checklist",
  "checklist": [
    {
      "name": "Does not accept the technology",
      "description": "review.md does NOT simply validate or endorse the technology choice without questioning it",
      "max_score": 15
    },
    {
      "name": "Names a specific alternative",
      "description": "review.md asks why this technology over at least one specifically named alternative (not a vague 'other options')",
      "max_score": 25
    },
    {
      "name": "Asks 2-year scenario question",
      "description": "review.md asks what happens in 2 years — or uses a realistic future scenario (team growth, data volume, migration, vendor change) to probe the decision",
      "max_score": 25
    },
    {
      "name": "Scenario is specific",
      "description": "The 2-year or future scenario posed is concrete and specific (e.g. 'when the team doubles', 'when data volume hits X') rather than generic ('in the future')",
      "max_score": 20
    },
    {
      "name": "Question is direct",
      "description": "review.md directly asks 'why this over [alternative]?' or equivalent — not merely implies it",
      "max_score": 15
    }
  ]
}