Content
100%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
This is an excellent skill that demonstrates strong technical writing for a complex multi-step protocol. It is concise yet thorough, with executable examples, explicit HALT conditions, retry logic with exponential backoff, and a clear verification phase. The progressive disclosure via companion tiles keeps the main document focused while ensuring supporting concerns are addressed.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The content is lean and efficient. Every section serves a purpose—no explanations of what TUS is, what Supabase is, or how HTTP works. It assumes Claude's competence and focuses purely on the specific protocol steps and constraints. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides fully executable curl examples for initialization, chunk upload, and resume operations. Headers, base64 encoding, and specific byte sizes are all spelled out concretely. The HALT conditions are explicit and unambiguous. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Five clearly sequenced phases with explicit validation checkpoints (HALT conditions at phases 1, 2, 4), a feedback loop for network failure recovery (HEAD request to resume), exponential backoff retry logic for 409 conflicts, and a final verification phase. This is exemplary workflow design for a multi-step destructive/network operation. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | References companion tiles (supabase-mcp-verification, storage-path-validation) at the top with clear paths, keeping the main skill focused on the TUS upload workflow. No deeply nested references; everything is one level deep and clearly signaled. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 12 / 12 Passed |