CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

iasv/deal-evaluate

Two-tier dealflow evaluation: research dossier (15-25 pages) and executive memo (5-7 pages) with anti-bias MoE layer, True Potential Council, and arithmetic verification

67

Quality

84%

Does it follow best practices?

Impact

No eval scenarios have been run

SecuritybySnyk

Advisory

Suggest reviewing before use

Overview
Quality
Evals
Security
Files

VERIFICATION-CHECKLIST.mdreferences/

Arithmetic Verification & Reconciliation Checklist

This step is NON-OPTIONAL. Every evaluation must pass these checks before the document is finalized. Failure to complete this step has caused score inflation, header/body mismatches, and broken cross-evaluation comparability.

Verification Steps

Do not finalize the evaluation until all checks pass.

CHECK 1: SCORECARD ARITHMETIC

For each row in the IASV Scorecard:

  • Verify: Score x Weight = Weighted (to 2 decimal places)
  • Sum all Weighted values
  • Compare to the reported Total Weighted Score
  • If mismatch: FIX the Total to match the arithmetic

Show the math explicitly:

DimensionScorex Weight= WeightedPass?
TeamX.Xx 0.25= X.XX
MarketX.Xx 0.20= X.XX
ProductX.Xx 0.15= X.XX
True Pot.X.Xx 0.15= X.XX
TractionX.Xx 0.10= X.XX
CompetitionX.Xx 0.10= X.XX
TermsX.Xx 0.05= X.XX
TOTAL= X.XX

CHECK 2: TPS ARITHMETIC

  • Verify: (Defensibility x 0.35) + (Market Velocity x 0.35) + (Expansion x 0.30) = reported TPS
  • If mismatch: FIX the TPS

CHECK 3: HEADER-BODY RECONCILIATION

Every value in the document header/executive summary MUST match the calculated value in the body:

  • Header Scorecard score = Body scorecard total (from Check 1)
  • Header TPS = Body TPS calculation (from Check 2)
  • Header Council Consensus = Body MoE weighted average
  • Header Confidence = Body confidence assessment
  • If ANY mismatch: FIX the header to match the body

CHECK 4: SCALE CONSISTENCY

  • All IASV Scorecard dimension scores: MUST be on 1-5 scale
  • TPC sub-component scores (Defensibility, Market Velocity, Expansion): MUST be on 1-5 scale
  • Anti-Bias MoE expert scores: MUST be on /100 scale
  • Council Consensus: MUST be on /100 scale
  • Flag any /10 references in scorecard scores as errors

CHECK 5: NO AD-HOC ADJUSTMENTS

  • The final score is the weighted sum of the scorecard dimensions. Period.
  • NO "signal premiums," "category-creation adjustments," "a16z premiums," or other post-hoc modifiers
  • If a factor deserves weight, adjust the relevant dimension score instead
  • Speculative "if verified" scores belong in body text only, NEVER in headers

CHECK 6: SIGNAL VALIDATION

  • 3.8 - 5.0 = INVEST
  • 2.8 - 3.7 = INVESTIGATE
  • Below 2.8 = PASS (unless explicitly overridden with stated reason)
  • If signal doesn't match score range: either fix the signal or document the override reason

CHECK 7: BASE SCORE IN HEADER

  • The header reports ONLY the current base score
  • Speculative scenarios ("if traction verified, score would be X.XX") belong in body text
  • Never use a conditional/speculative score as the headline number

VERIFICATION RESULT:

  • Check 1: Scorecard arithmetic verified
  • Check 2: TPS arithmetic verified
  • Check 3: Header-body reconciliation complete
  • Check 4: Scale consistency confirmed
  • Check 5: No ad-hoc adjustments present
  • Check 6: Signal matches score range
  • Check 7: Base score in header confirmed

ALL CHECKS MUST PASS before the evaluation document is written.

references

ANTI-BIAS-MOE.md

TRUE-POTENTIAL-COUNCIL.md

VERIFICATION-CHECKLIST.md

SKILL.md

tile.json