Rapid batch triage of 10-50+ startups into investment tiers using IASV criteria. Screens for thesis fit, red flags, and prioritizes deep-dive candidates.
72
90%
Does it follow best practices?
Impact
—
No eval scenarios have been run
Advisory
Suggest reviewing before use
Screen batches of startups (10-50+) from pitch events, demo days, or accelerator showcases. Identify the 5-10 candidates worth presenting to the investment group. This is triage — speed and accuracy in filtering, not comprehensive analysis.
v2.0 changes (Ed feedback 2026-04-30):
| Tier | Label | Action | Criteria |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | HIGH PRIORITY | Present to group | Strong signals across multiple dimensions |
| 2 | INTERESTING | Needs more info | Promising but missing key data points |
| 3 | WATCHLIST | Monitor | Interesting thesis but too early/wrong timing |
| 4 | PASS | Do not proceed | Clear disqualifying factors |
Score each company across five weighted dimensions. Apply hard filters first, then score.
Hard filters (auto-PASS):
No sector is an automatic disqualifier. IASV has invested across biotech, climate, space, defense, hardware, consumer, and more. Every sector is evaluated case-by-case. The only hard filter is stage.
Soft flags (note but evaluate):
| Dimension | Weight | Strong Signal Examples |
|---|---|---|
| Traction | 30% | Revenue >$500K ARR, 100+ paying customers, >20% MoM growth |
| Team | 25% | Prior exits, 5+ yrs domain expertise, technical co-founder |
| Market | 20% | TAM >$1B, clear macro tailwind, regulatory advantage |
| Differentiation | 15% | Proprietary IP, network effects, data moat |
| Stage Fit | 10% | Matches fund thesis, check size appropriate |
Tier thresholds: Score >=5 strong signals = Tier 1. Score 3-4 = Tier 2. Below 3 = Tier 3/4 (deeper review needed).
Full signal definitions and filter code: See SCREENING-CRITERIA.md
Extract for each company: name, one-line description, sector, stage, amount raised/seeking, key metrics (revenue, customers, growth), contact info, and any call notes. Sources: pitch decks, brochures, meeting notes, company websites.
Apply hard filters (stage, sector, geography), then score remaining companies using weighted criteria table above.
Example — scoring "Acme AI":
Revenue $200K ARR (+1 traction), 30 customers (+1 traction), founder has prior exit (+2 team), TAM $2B (+1 market), proprietary model (+1 differentiation) = 6 points -> Tier 1. Missing: growth rate data -> flag for Phase 3 validation.
For Tier 1/2 companies, validate claims via web search:
SEARCH QUERIES:
- "{company_name} funding 2025 2026"
- "{founder_name} {company_name} LinkedIn"
- "{company_name} customers case study"
- "{company_name} vs {competitor}"Validate: funding history, team backgrounds, customer references, competitive landscape, recent news.
Output per shortlisted company (CONCISE — 3-5 sentences in comments, no more):
## {Company Name}
**Website:** {url} | **Sector:** {sector} | **Stage:** {stage}
**Raised:** {amount} | **Asking:** {amount and instrument}
**What they do:** {1 sentence}
**Why interesting:** {2-3 sentences — key signals, why this fits IASV thesis}
**Key risk:** {1 sentence — the single biggest concern}
**Next step:** {Schedule call / Request deck / Monitor}Full templates: screening-worksheet.md | shortlist-template.md
For YC batch screening specifically, apply these additional lenses:
| Principle | Detail |
|---|---|
| Speed over depth | Max 5 min per company on initial pass |
| Always validate | Tier 1/2 must have web research citations |
| Force prioritization | Shortlist must be 3-15 companies; if >15, re-tighten filters |
| Document passes | Every PASS needs a stated reason |
| Signal hierarchy | Revenue > customers > pilots > interest > nothing |
| One risk per company | Explicitly list alongside positives to avoid confirmation bias |
| No false eliminators | Hardware/consumer/robotics are NOT auto-pass (updated 2026-04-30) |
pipeline/Deals/{Event}/Feed Tier 1 companies to deal-evaluate for full investment memo (5-7 pages, concise format per v3.0).