CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

igmarin/rails-agent-skills

Curated library of AI agent skills for Ruby on Rails development. Covers code review, architecture, security, testing (RSpec), engines, service objects, DDD patterns, and workflow automation.

95

2.21x
Quality

97%

Does it follow best practices?

Impact

91%

2.21x

Average score across 3 eval scenarios

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No known issues

Overview
Quality
Evals
Security
Files

Quality

Discovery

100%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

This is a strong description that clearly articulates specific capabilities (drafting, classifying, creating tickets), uses natural trigger terms users would employ, and explicitly states both what the skill does and when to use it. The description is concise yet comprehensive, covering the full workflow from plan intake through ticket creation in an issue tracker.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Lists multiple specific concrete actions: 'Drafts, classifies, and optionally creates tickets from an initiative plan.' Also mentions sprint-placement guidance and shaping plans into tickets, which are distinct concrete capabilities.

3 / 3

Completeness

Clearly answers both what ('Drafts, classifies, and optionally creates tickets from an initiative plan') and when ('Use when the user provides a plan and wants ticket drafts, wants help shaping a plan into tickets, wants sprint-placement guidance, or wants tickets created in an issue tracker after the plan is approved').

3 / 3

Trigger Term Quality

Includes natural keywords users would say: 'plan', 'ticket drafts', 'tickets', 'sprint-placement', 'issue tracker', 'approved'. These cover common variations of how users would describe this workflow.

3 / 3

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The combination of initiative plans, ticket drafting/classification, sprint placement, and issue tracker creation carves out a clear niche. Unlikely to conflict with generic project management or coding skills due to the specific workflow described.

3 / 3

Total

12

/

12

Passed

Implementation

85%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

This is a well-structured skill with a clear multi-step workflow, concrete examples, and appropriate progressive disclosure. The classification table and title conventions provide specific, actionable guidance. Minor verbosity in a few sections (like the redundancy-reduction meta-instructions) prevents a perfect conciseness score, but overall the content is efficient and well-targeted.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The content is mostly efficient and avoids explaining basic concepts, but some sections like 'Reduce redundancy' (step 5) are meta-instructions about writing style that Claude already knows. The sprint placement heuristics and ticket creation guidance sections are well-targeted but could be slightly tighter.

2 / 3

Actionability

The skill provides concrete classification tables, specific title prefix conventions, a clear section-order template, and a complete ticket example with all five sections filled out. The creation output checklist (issue keys, confirmed status, sprint/bucket, assumptions) is specific and actionable.

3 / 3

Workflow Clarity

The six-step workflow is clearly sequenced with logical progression from normalization through classification, drafting, and creation. Step 6 includes an explicit approval gate before creating issues, and the ticket creation guidance includes a validation step ('validate one issue first if sprint field or workflow behavior is uncertain'), providing a proper feedback loop for risky operations.

3 / 3

Progressive Disclosure

The skill provides a clear overview with well-signaled references to EXAMPLES.md for the full plan-to-ticket example, keeping the main file focused on the workflow and rules. The integration table at the end cleanly signals related skills. Content is appropriately split between inline guidance and external examples.

3 / 3

Total

11

/

12

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation11 / 11 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Reviewed

Table of Contents