Curated library of 42 public AI agent skills for Ruby on Rails development, plus 5 callable workflow skills. Organized by category: planning, testing, code-quality, ddd, engines, infrastructure, api, patterns, context, orchestration, and workflows. Covers code review, architecture, security, testing (RSpec), engines, service objects, DDD patterns, and TDD automation.
97
97%
Does it follow best practices?
Impact
Pending
No eval scenarios have been run
Passed
No known issues
Use this skill when the task is to write, review, or clean up RSpec tests.
Core principle: Prefer behavioral confidence over implementation coupling. Good specs are readable, deterministic, and cheap to maintain.
| Aspect | Rule |
|---|---|
| Spec types | Model: domain logic; Request: HTTP endpoints (prefer over controller); Job: background processing; Service/PORO: no Rails helpers; System: critical E2E only (slow) |
| Assertions | Test behavior, not implementation |
| Factories | Minimal — only attributes needed; use traits for optional states; prefer build/build_stubbed over create |
| Mocking | Stub external boundaries, not internal code |
| Isolation | Each example independent; no shared mutable state |
| Naming | describe for class/method, context for scenario |
| Service specs | Required: describe '.call' and subject(:result) for the primary invocation |
let vs let! | Default to let; let! ONLY when object must exist before example runs |
| External service mocking | allow(ServiceClass).to receive(:method) — not instance_double; instance_double only for injected collaborators |
| Example names | Present tense: it 'returns the user', never it 'should ...'; NEVER contains the word "and" — split into separate examples |
aggregate_failures | Use when asserting multiple related items in one example |
When driving new behaviour with RSpec, follow this sequence:
| Change type | Start with |
|---|---|
| Pure domain logic | Model or PORO service spec |
| HTTP endpoint behaviour | Request spec |
| Background processing | Job spec |
| Cross-layer user journey | System spec (sparingly) |
Minimal factories only. Never rely on factory defaults for business logic — set explicitly or use traits. Avoid create when build/build_stubbed suffices.
RSpec.describe Invoices::MarkOverdue do
describe '.call' do
subject(:result) { described_class.call(invoice: invoice) }
context 'when the invoice is overdue and unpaid' do
let(:invoice) { create(:invoice, due_date: 2.days.ago, paid_at: nil) }
it 'marks the invoice overdue' do
expect { result }.to change { invoice.reload.overdue? }.from(false).to(true)
end
end
context 'when the invoice is already paid' do
let(:invoice) { create(:invoice, due_date: 2.days.ago, paid_at: 1.day.ago) }
it 'does not change the invoice' do
expect { result }.not_to change { invoice.reload.updated_at }
end
end
end
end→ Full examples: EXAMPLES.md | Copy-paste templates: assets/spec_templates.md
Use only when the same behavioural contract applies to multiple subjects without per-example let overrides. Avoid when each context needs different setup — that signals a wrong abstraction. → Example in EXAMPLES.md
The word "and" in an it / specify description means the example is asserting two behaviors. Split it. One behavior per example. Applies to every spec type — model, request, service, job, mailer, system.
# BAD — two assertions; if the first fails, the second never runs
it 'returns 201 and creates the record' do; end
it 'saves the order and sends the confirmation email' do; end
it 'updates the user and logs the change' do; end
# GOOD — one observable outcome per example
it 'returns 201' do; end
it 'creates the record' do; end
it 'saves the order' do; end
it 'sends the confirmation email' do; endSelf-check before finalizing any spec: scan every it '...' / it "..." / specify '...' string for the word and (case-insensitive, word-boundary). Every hit is a split — no exceptions for "convenience" examples like 'returns nil and does not raise'.
When asked to write or review RSpec specs, your output MUST satisfy each rule below. Each is graded independently — one violation drops the whole check.
app/foo/bar.rb → spec/foo/bar_spec.rb.# frozen_string_literal: true as the first line of every spec file.RSpec.describe uses the full constant path (RSpec.describe Module::Class do), not a string.describe '#method' / describe '.class_method' for each method under test.context 'when ...' / context 'with ...' for scenario variations — never use context to group methods.let for test data, let! ONLY when the object must exist before the action under test.let_it_be unless the project already depends on test-prof (check Gemfile.lock first).subject(:result) { ... } for service / PORO specs invoking .call.travel_to / freeze_time for any time-dependent assertion — never set past Time.now or stub Time.current directly.allow(SomeClient).to receive(:method)); ActiveRecord finders are NEVER mocked.| Cause | Fix |
|---|---|
| Time-dependent logic | freeze_time / travel_to; never set past dates as shortcut |
| State leakage | Each example sets up own state; avoid before(:all) |
| Async jobs | queue_adapter = :test + have_enqueued_job; never assert side-effects imperatively |
| External HTTP | WebMock / VCR; never allow real network in CI |
| DB state bleed | Transactional fixtures or DatabaseCleaner; never share let! across contexts |
| Race conditions | Explicit Capybara waits; avoid sleep |
| Imprecise assertions | change.from().to() over final state; exact values over be_truthy/be_falsey; never assert updated_at |
build
docs
mcp_server
skills
api
api-rest-collection
rails-graphql-best-practices
code-quality
rails-architecture-review
rails-code-conventions
rails-code-review
rails-review-response
rails-security-review
rails-stack-conventions
assets
snippets
refactor-safely
context
rails-context-engineering
rails-project-onboarding
ddd
ddd-boundaries-review
ddd-rails-modeling
ddd-ubiquitous-language
engines
rails-engine-compatibility
rails-engine-docs
rails-engine-extraction
rails-engine-installers
rails-engine-release
rails-engine-reviewer
rails-engine-testing
infrastructure
rails-api-versioning
rails-background-jobs
rails-database-seeding
rails-frontend-hotwire
rails-migration-safety
rails-performance-optimization
orchestration
rails-skills-orchestrator
patterns
ruby-service-objects
strategy-factory-null-calculator
yard-documentation
planning
create-prd
generate-tasks
ticket-planning
testing
rails-bug-triage
rails-tdd-slices
rspec-best-practices
rspec-service-testing
workflows