Curated library of 41 public AI agent skills for Ruby on Rails development. Organized by category: planning, testing, code-quality, ddd, engines, infrastructure, api, patterns, context, and orchestration. Covers code review, architecture, security, testing (RSpec), engines, service objects, DDD patterns, and TDD automation. Repository workflows remain documented in GitHub but are intentionally excluded from the Tessl tile.
95
93%
Does it follow best practices?
Impact
96%
1.77xAverage score across 41 eval scenarios
Passed
No known issues
{
"context": "Checks whether the final artifact follows the code-review instructions from the published Rails Agent Skills tile.",
"type": "weighted_checklist",
"checklist": [
{
"name": "instruction-1",
"description": "The submitted artifact follows this skill instruction: Self-review the actual full branch diff using the Review Order below.",
"max_score": 12
},
{
"name": "instruction-2",
"description": "The submitted artifact follows this skill instruction: generate-tasks must include a \"Code review before merge\" task.",
"max_score": 11
},
{
"name": "instruction-3",
"description": "The submitted artifact follows this skill instruction: **Core principle:** Review early, review often. Self-review before PR. Re-review after significant changes.",
"max_score": 11
},
{
"name": "instruction-4",
"description": "The submitted artifact follows this skill instruction: Use **only** these labels:",
"max_score": 11
},
{
"name": "instruction-5",
"description": "The submitted artifact follows this skill instruction: **`Critical`** — security, data loss, crash, or **Always Critical** (see below). Block merge.",
"max_score": 11
},
{
"name": "instruction-6",
"description": "The submitted artifact follows this skill instruction: **Always Critical (flag every occurrence):**",
"max_score": 11
},
{
"name": "instruction-7",
"description": "The submitted artifact follows this skill instruction: **Review principle** — State: \"Review early, review often. Self-review before PR. Re-review after significant changes.\"",
"max_score": 11
},
{
"name": "instruction-8",
"description": "The submitted artifact follows this skill instruction: Findings must come from an actual diff or provided file contents. Do not present a simulated PR review as if it were a completed review of real code.",
"max_score": 11
},
{
"name": "instruction-9",
"description": "The submitted artifact follows this skill instruction: **Generate-tasks handoff** — Always include a `Code review before merge` task or task-list line, even when the user did not ask for a full task breakdown. If a full task list is out of scope, add a short handoff note with that exact task title.",
"max_score": 11
}
]
}docs
evals
scenario-1
scenario-2
scenario-3
scenario-4
scenario-5
scenario-6
scenario-7
scenario-8
scenario-9
scenario-10
scenario-11
scenario-12
scenario-13
scenario-14
scenario-15
scenario-16
scenario-17
scenario-18
scenario-19
scenario-20
scenario-21
scenario-22
scenario-23
scenario-24
scenario-25
scenario-26
scenario-27
scenario-28
scenario-29
scenario-30
scenario-31
scenario-32
scenario-33
scenario-34
scenario-35
scenario-36
scenario-37
scenario-38
scenario-39
scenario-40
scenario-41
mcp_server
skills
api
generate-api-collection
implement-graphql
code-quality
apply-code-conventions
apply-stack-conventions
assets
snippets
code-review
refactor-code
respond-to-review
review-architecture
security-check
context
load-context
setup-environment
ddd
define-domain-language
model-domain
review-domain-boundaries
engines
create-engine
create-engine-installer
document-engine
extract-engine
release-engine
review-engine
test-engine
upgrade-engine
infrastructure
implement-background-job
implement-hotwire
optimize-performance
review-migration
seed-database
version-api
orchestration
skill-router
patterns
create-service-object
implement-calculator-pattern
write-yard-docs
planning
create-prd
generate-tasks
plan-tickets
testing
plan-tests
test-service
triage-bug
write-tests
workflows