Koog 1.0 idioms, gotchas, and scaffolding skills for Kotlin agents on the JVM
87
88%
Does it follow best practices?
Impact
87%
1.85xAverage score across 45 eval scenarios
Advisory
Suggest reviewing before use
{
"context": "Tests whether the agent uses the Attachment.image factory and threads it through a custom node that produces a Message.User with attachments, then sends via nodeLLMSendMessage — rather than reaching for OCR, base64-encoding by hand, or stringifying the file path into the prompt text.",
"type": "weighted_checklist",
"checklist": [
{
"name": "Uses Attachment.image to wrap the file",
"description": "Builds the attachment via Attachment.image(file) (or an equivalent factory taking the File). Does NOT base64-encode the bytes by hand, does NOT call OCR or stringify the path into the prompt",
"max_score": 30
},
{
"name": "Constructs a Message.User with attachments",
"description": "Creates a Message.User with both a content string (the developer's question) and the attachments list containing the image. Not a plain string prompt",
"max_score": 25
},
{
"name": "Sends via nodeLLMSendMessage, not nodeLLMRequest",
"description": "Wires the Message.User into a nodeLLMSendMessage (or variant) — Message.User-input family. Does NOT use nodeLLMRequest (which takes String input — wrong family for the Message.User shape this strategy needs)",
"max_score": 20
},
{
"name": "Strategy is typed strategy<File, String>",
"description": "Declares strategy<File, String>(\"...\") so the input is the File and the output is the LLM's text reply. Type parameters match the developer's stated input/output shape",
"max_score": 15
},
{
"name": "Returns text from a final nodeFinish edge",
"description": "Routes from nodeLLMSendMessage to nodeFinish on the text-message branch (onTextMessage { true }) so the agent's output is the LLM's description",
"max_score": 10
}
]
}evals
scenario-1
scenario-2
scenario-3
scenario-4
scenario-5
scenario-6
scenario-7
scenario-8
scenario-9
scenario-10
scenario-11
scenario-12
scenario-13
scenario-14
scenario-15
scenario-16
scenario-17
scenario-18
scenario-19
scenario-20
scenario-21
scenario-22
scenario-23
scenario-24
scenario-25
scenario-26
scenario-27
scenario-28
scenario-29
scenario-30
scenario-31
scenario-32
scenario-33
scenario-34
scenario-35
scenario-36
scenario-37
scenario-38
scenario-39
scenario-40
scenario-41
scenario-42
scenario-43
scenario-44
scenario-45
skills
add-observability
add-persistence
add-rag
add-structured-output
add-token-budgeting
add-tool
cache-llm-calls
define-prompt
domain-model-subtask-pipeline
references
enable-prompt-caching
handle-agent-events
manage-state
migrate-from-0-x
model-planner-subtasks
persist-chat-history
query-sql-from-agent
scaffold-agent
snapshot-and-restore
test-koog-agents
trace-agent-internals
use-attachments
use-functional-agent
use-llm-node-variants
use-planner
wire-a2a
wire-acp-server
wire-ktor-server
wire-mcp-server
wire-spring-boot