Collect and document UX feedback when using tools as an AI agent.
100
100%
Does it follow best practices?
Impact
Pending
No eval scenarios have been run
Passed
No known issues
Quality
Discovery
100%Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.
This is a well-crafted skill description that excels across all dimensions. It clearly states what the skill does (collect UX feedback, record interactions and outcomes), provides explicit trigger guidance with natural user language, and carves out a distinct niche around AI agent tool feedback that minimizes conflict risk with other skills.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Specificity | Lists multiple specific concrete actions: 'Collect and document UX feedback', 'Records unclear interactions, unexpected outcomes, and pleasant experiences'. These are clear, actionable capabilities. | 3 / 3 |
Completeness | Clearly answers both what ('Collect and document UX feedback...Records unclear interactions, unexpected outcomes, and pleasant experiences') AND when ('Use when the user asks for: bug report, feature request...'). Has explicit 'Use when' clause with specific triggers. | 3 / 3 |
Trigger Term Quality | Includes natural keywords users would say: 'bug report', 'feature request', 'usability feedback', 'tool improvement suggestions', and the conversational phrase 'what do you think about this tool'. Good coverage of variations. | 3 / 3 |
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk | Clear niche focused on UX feedback collection for AI agent tool usage. The specific context of 'using tools as an AI agent' and triggers like 'usability feedback' and 'tool improvement suggestions' make it distinct from general feedback or documentation skills. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 12 / 12 Passed |
Implementation
100%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
This is a well-crafted skill that efficiently teaches Claude how to collect and document UX feedback. It excels in providing concrete examples for each feedback category and a clear summary process. The content is appropriately scoped and assumes Claude's competence without over-explaining.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The skill is lean and efficient, with no unnecessary explanations. Every section serves a purpose and assumes Claude understands concepts like UX feedback and documentation without over-explaining. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides concrete, specific examples of what to record in each category (unclear UX, unexpected outcomes, pleasant interactions). The summary process has clear numbered steps with specific actions like identifying patterns and linking to value metrics. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The workflow is clear: record feedback immediately during work, then follow a 4-step summary process at completion. For this type of documentation skill, the sequence is unambiguous and appropriate without needing validation checkpoints. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | For a simple, focused skill under 50 lines, the content is well-organized with clear sections (intro, examples by category, summary process). No external references are needed and the structure supports easy scanning. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 12 / 12 Passed |
Validation
100%Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.
Validation — 11 / 11 Passed
Validation for skill structure
No warnings or errors.
Reviewed
Table of Contents