CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

maj-labs/app-store-review

Full-lifecycle Apple App Store review for iOS and iPadOS apps. Use for pre-submission audits, rejection diagnosis and Resolution Center replies, Guideline 4.3 spam or similarity recovery, human-craft and low-effort audits, App Review Notes, privacy manifests, Info.plist permission strings, subscriptions, Sign in with Apple, account deletion, UGC, third-party AI consent, TestFlight or App Store readiness, and vague requests such as "review my app" or "will Apple approve this" when an Xcode, Expo, React Native, or Flutter project is present. Produces evidence-tagged Markdown, JSON, and a self-contained visual HTML report, runs a read-only deterministic scan first, and only offers grouped fixes after the report.

97

2.08x
Quality

97%

Does it follow best practices?

Impact

98%

2.08x

Average score across 4 eval scenarios

SecuritybySnyk

Low

Low-risk findings worth noting

Overview
Quality
Evals
Security
Files

Quality

Content

92%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

A well-structured, actionable skill body with concrete commands, explicit validation gates, and clean one-level-deep reference navigation. Its only minor weakness is slight verbosity in the rules section.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is dense and directive, assuming Claude's competence (no primers on what the App Store or Info.plist are), though the 11-item Non-negotiable rules list and a few lengthy rules (e.g. rule 9) could be tightened slightly.

4 / 5

Actionability

Provides copy-paste-ready commands with concrete flags (e.g. `python3 scripts/app_store_review_scan.py <project-path> --format all --output-dir <report-directory>`), exact emitted header lines, and precise output-gate blocks covering the common cases.

5 / 5

Workflow Clarity

Multi-step flow is clearly sequenced (Discover → Establish scope → Mode A/B/C → Output gates → Current-policy check) with explicit validation gates, a literal output-gate checklist, approval-before-edit feedback loops, and verifiable checkpoints.

5 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

SKILL.md is a clear overview with well-signaled one-level-deep references to 8 real files under references/ and 2 real scripts, each linked in a Packaged resources section; all referenced paths exist and content is appropriately split.

5 / 5

Total

19

/

20

Passed

Description

100%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A highly specific, third-person description that clearly states both capability and trigger conditions with concrete natural-language phrases and comprehensive action coverage. It is distinct within a well-defined niche and poses minimal conflict risk.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Lists multiple concrete actions — pre-submission audits, rejection diagnosis, Resolution Center replies, Guideline 4.3 recovery, privacy manifests, Info.plist permission strings, subscriptions, Sign in with Apple, account deletion, UGC, AI consent, TestFlight readiness, plus producing Markdown/JSON/HTML and running a read-only scan — giving comprehensive coverage.

5 / 5

Completeness

Explicitly answers both 'what' (full-lifecycle review producing evidence-tagged Markdown/JSON/HTML, running a deterministic scan, offering grouped fixes) and 'when' (an explicit 'Use for...' clause with concrete trigger scenarios and project-presence conditions).

5 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Covers natural user phrases ('review my app', 'will Apple approve this') alongside domain terms (App Store, Resolution Center, Guideline 4.3, App Review Notes, TestFlight) and framework names (Xcode, Expo, React Native, Flutter), including synonyms and concrete trigger phrasing.

5 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Occupies a clear niche — Apple App Store review for iOS/iPadOS — with domain-specific triggers (Guideline 4.3, Resolution Center, App Review Notes) that make conflict with unrelated skills minimal.

5 / 5

Total

20

/

20

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Reviewed

Table of Contents