Content
85%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
This is a well-crafted skill that is concise, well-structured, and provides clear decision frameworks (discoverability filter, quality gate) for creating AGENTS.md files. Its main weakness is the lack of concrete examples—a sample AGENTS.md snippet showing good vs. bad entries would significantly improve actionability. The workflow is logical and includes appropriate validation steps.
Suggestions
Add a concrete example showing 2-3 good AGENTS.md entries alongside 2-3 bad entries that fail the discoverability filter, to make the guidance more immediately executable.
Include a short template or skeleton of a well-formed AGENTS.md file that Claude can use as a starting point when creating one from scratch.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Every section earns its place. There's no explanation of what AGENTS.md is in general terms or what agents are—it jumps straight into actionable filtering criteria and structural guidance. The content is lean and assumes Claude's intelligence throughout. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | The guidance is specific and well-structured with clear decision criteria (discoverability filter, quality gate), but it lacks concrete examples of actual AGENTS.md output. There are no before/after examples or a template showing what a good AGENTS.md looks like, which would make it more directly executable. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The workflow is clear: check source files first, apply the discoverability filter per-line, structure output using recommended sections, then run the quality gate before finalizing. The quality gate serves as an explicit validation checkpoint with a delete-if-fails feedback loop. For this type of non-destructive content generation task, this level of workflow clarity is sufficient. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | For a standalone skill with no bundle files, the content is well-organized into clearly labeled sections that progress logically from when to use, to core rules, to what to include/exclude, to structure, to source files, to maintenance, to final validation. No external references are needed for this scope. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |