metis-strategy/metis-legal-drafting
Draft Statements of Work (SOWs) from client templates and Metis proposals, and review/redline Master Services Agreements (MSAs) from the Supplier perspective. Triggers on SOW drafting, MSA review, contract redlining, scope creep analysis, deliverable tables, invoice schedules, IP carve-outs, or any mention of SOW, MSA, master agreement, statement of work, redline, or contract review in the context of Metis Strategy engagements.
94
94%
Does it follow best practices?
Impact
Pending
No eval scenarios have been run
Advisory
Suggest reviewing before use
firm-metadata.mdreferences/
Metis Strategy — Firm Metadata
This file is the single source of truth for Metis Strategy entity details used in SOW drafting and MSA review. Auto-populate these values into client templates and agreements wherever the corresponding fields appear.
Entity Details
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Legal Name | Metis Strategy LLC |
| Entity Type | Delaware limited liability company |
| Principal Address | 4817 Dorset Avenue, Chevy Chase, MD 20815, United States |
| TIN/EIN | 36-4429904 |
Engagement Contact
The engagement contact varies per SOW/MSA. Always ask the consultant for:
- Contact name and title
- Email address
- Phone number
Do not pre-populate contact fields with a default — each engagement has its own lead.
Insurance Coverage
Current Metis Strategy insurance coverage. When reviewing an MSA, compare the client's required minimums against these amounts and flag any shortfalls.
| Coverage | Current Amount |
|---|---|
| Workers Comp & Employers Liability | $1,000,000 |
| Errors & Omissions and Cyber Insurance | $5,000,000 |
| Crime Policy | $1,000,000 |
| Commercial General Liability | $4,000,000 |
| Automobile Liability | $2,000,000 |
| Umbrella Liability | $4,000,000 |
| Computer and Funds Transfer Fraud | $1,000,000 |
How to flag insurance gaps
When an MSA specifies insurance minimums, compare each requirement against the table above:
- If a required coverage exceeds Metis's current amount, flag it as a gap with the delta
- If a required coverage type is not listed above, flag it as a new requirement to discuss with Metis leadership
- If all requirements are met, note that in the risk analysis as a positive finding
- Do not recommend striking insurance requirements solely because they exceed current coverage — instead, flag the gap and let the consultant decide whether to negotiate or increase coverage