Progressive concept teaching through three depth levels (Core → Mechanics → Deep Dive). Creates diagrams, provides annotated code walkthroughs from the current codebase, and builds explanations from fundamentals to production internals. Triggers: "teach me about [pattern/concept]", "how does [architecture/pattern] work", "walk me through [this implementation]", "tutorial on [concept]", "deep dive into [system/pattern]", "help me understand [this design]" Use when: user requests multi-level learning about code patterns, architecture, or implementation mechanics with checkpoint-based progression. Not for: quick answers, single-sentence explanations, code fixes, or "what does this line do" questions—those are standard assistance.
98
Quality
100%
Does it follow best practices?
Impact
97%
1.44xAverage score across 5 eval scenarios
Discovery
100%Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.
This is a well-crafted skill description that excels across all dimensions. It provides specific capabilities (three-level teaching, diagrams, code walkthroughs), natural trigger phrases users would actually say, explicit 'Use when' and 'Not for' clauses, and clear differentiation from standard assistance. The description uses proper third-person voice throughout.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Specificity | Lists multiple specific concrete actions: 'Progressive concept teaching through three depth levels', 'Creates diagrams', 'provides annotated code walkthroughs', 'builds explanations from fundamentals to production internals'. The three-level structure (Core → Mechanics → Deep Dive) adds concrete methodology. | 3 / 3 |
Completeness | Clearly answers both what (progressive teaching with diagrams, code walkthroughs, three depth levels) AND when (explicit 'Use when' clause plus 'Triggers' section). Also includes helpful 'Not for' boundary conditions that clarify scope. | 3 / 3 |
Trigger Term Quality | Excellent coverage of natural trigger phrases users would say: 'teach me about', 'how does [X] work', 'walk me through', 'tutorial on', 'deep dive into', 'help me understand'. These are realistic user phrasings with good variation. | 3 / 3 |
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk | Clear niche focused on multi-level progressive learning with checkpoint-based progression. The 'Not for' section explicitly distinguishes from standard code assistance, reducing conflict risk with general coding skills. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 12 / 12 Passed |
Implementation
100%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
This is an excellent skill file that demonstrates strong content quality across all dimensions. It provides a clear, actionable teaching framework with explicit checkpoints, concrete examples, and appropriate references to supporting documentation. The structure respects token efficiency while delivering comprehensive guidance for multi-level concept teaching.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The skill is lean and efficient, using bullet points and structured formatting without explaining concepts Claude already knows. Every section serves a clear purpose with no padding or unnecessary context. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides concrete workflow steps, specific checkpoint dialogue examples, clear format templates with file:line references, and explicit exit signals. The example format for Level 1 is copy-paste ready. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear 3-level sequence with explicit checkpoints after each level, defined exit signals, and sample dialogue showing the complete interaction flow. The workflow is unambiguous and includes feedback loops via user checkpoints. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-structured overview with clear one-level-deep references to supporting files (trigger-reference.md, examples.md, visualization-guide.md). Content is appropriately split between quick reference and detailed sections. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 12 / 12 Passed |
Validation
100%Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.
Validation — 16 / 16 Passed
Validation for skill structure
No warnings or errors.
Install with Tessl CLI
npx tessl i neomatrix369/learning-opportunity@0.1.0Reviewed
Table of Contents