Names the domain (RFC process for solo developers with AI agents) and describes the core action (prevents premature complexity, forces problem-first thinking), but doesn't list multiple concrete actions like 'create RFC document', 'evaluate trade-offs', or 'document decisions'.

Clearly answers both what (lightweight RFC process that prevents premature complexity via problem-first thinking) and when (explicit 'Use when' clause with specific scenarios and trigger phrases). The 'Triggers on phrases like...' section provides explicit guidance.

Excellent coverage of natural trigger phrases users would actually say: 'should I add X', 'I'm thinking about introducing Y', 'is this overkill', 'do I need X', 'is X worth it', '/rfc'. These are realistic, conversational phrases.

Clear niche targeting technical decision-making for solo developers with AI agents. The specific trigger phrases ('is this overkill', 'do I need X', '/rfc') and focus on tool/library/architecture decisions make it unlikely to conflict with general coding or documentation skills.

The content is mostly efficient but includes some unnecessary elaboration. Phrases like 'This is the core anti-premature-complexity mechanism' and explanatory sentences about why stages exist could be trimmed. The challenge questions are useful but slightly verbose.

Provides concrete, specific guidance at each stage with exact questions to ask, specific outputs to produce, clear file paths for saving documents, and references to a template. The workflow is immediately executable.

Four stages are clearly sequenced with explicit goals for each stage. The instruction 'Do not skip stages. Each stage produces a specific output before moving on' establishes clear checkpoints. User confirmation is required before proceeding to documentation.

Well-structured with clear sections for each stage. Appropriately references external template file (references/rfc-template.md) rather than inlining it. Content is organized for easy navigation without being monolithic.