SCENARIO: Ownership gaps — new directory with no CODEOWNERS entry

A PR adds a new top-level directory platform/ with Terraform modules but

no CODEOWNERS rule. Any engineer can merge PRs to this directory with no

required reviewer.

Expected output:

[OWNERSHIP] platform/ — new top-level directory

Gap: No CODEOWNERS entry covers platform/**. PRs touching this path have

no required reviewer — any team member can self-merge.

Severity: HIGH

Recommendation: Add to .github/CODEOWNERS:

platform/ @platform-team @platform-leads

[OWNERSHIP] platform/eks-cluster/ — new Terraform module

Gap: No README.md in module directory. Purpose, inputs, outputs, and

owning team are undocumented.

Severity: MEDIUM

Recommendation: Add platform/eks-cluster/README.md with: description,

usage example, variable table, output table, and owning team.

[OWNERSHIP] platform/eks-cluster/variables.tf — 4 variables with no description

Gap: cluster_name, node_count, instance_type, region have no description field.

Severity: LOW

Recommendation: Add description = "..." to each variable block.

❌ CURRENT .github/CODEOWNERS — missing platform/ entry

• @platform-team

references/ @platform-team commands/ @platform-team examples/ @platform-team .claude-plugin/ @platform-leads CHANGELOG.md @platform-leads

platform/ <-- NOT PRESENT

✅ RECOMMENDED addition

platform/ @platform-team @platform-leads