NestJS architecture, dependency injection, validation, security, errors, testing, persistence, APIs, microservices, and deployment patterns with prioritized rule tiers and companion rule files.
99
100%
Does it follow best practices?
Impact
97%
1.12xAverage score across 2 eval scenarios
Advisory
Suggest reviewing before use
Create custom repositories to encapsulate complex queries and database logic. This keeps services focused on business logic, makes testing easier with mock repositories, and allows changing database implementations without affecting business code.
Incorrect (complex queries in services):
// Complex queries in services
@Injectable()
export class UsersService {
constructor(
@InjectRepository(User) private repo: Repository<User>,
) {}
async findActiveWithOrders(minOrders: number): Promise<User[]> {
// Complex query logic mixed with business logic
return this.repo
.createQueryBuilder('user')
.leftJoinAndSelect('user.orders', 'order')
.where('user.isActive = :active', { active: true })
.andWhere('user.deletedAt IS NULL')
.groupBy('user.id')
.having('COUNT(order.id) >= :min', { min: minOrders })
.orderBy('user.createdAt', 'DESC')
.getMany();
}
// Service becomes bloated with query logic
}Correct (custom repository with encapsulated queries):
// Custom repository with encapsulated queries
@Injectable()
export class UsersRepository {
constructor(
@InjectRepository(User) private repo: Repository<User>,
) {}
async findById(id: string): Promise<User | null> {
return this.repo.findOne({ where: { id } });
}
async findByEmail(email: string): Promise<User | null> {
return this.repo.findOne({ where: { email } });
}
async findActiveWithMinOrders(minOrders: number): Promise<User[]> {
return this.repo
.createQueryBuilder('user')
.leftJoinAndSelect('user.orders', 'order')
.where('user.isActive = :active', { active: true })
.andWhere('user.deletedAt IS NULL')
.groupBy('user.id')
.having('COUNT(order.id) >= :min', { min: minOrders })
.orderBy('user.createdAt', 'DESC')
.getMany();
}
async save(user: User): Promise<User> {
return this.repo.save(user);
}
}
// Clean service with business logic only
@Injectable()
export class UsersService {
constructor(private usersRepo: UsersRepository) {}
async getActiveUsersWithOrders(): Promise<User[]> {
return this.usersRepo.findActiveWithMinOrders(1);
}
async create(dto: CreateUserDto): Promise<User> {
const existing = await this.usersRepo.findByEmail(dto.email);
if (existing) {
throw new ConflictException('Email already registered');
}
const user = new User();
user.email = dto.email;
user.name = dto.name;
return this.usersRepo.save(user);
}
}Reference: Repository Pattern
evals
scenario-1
scenario-2
rules